background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

French Char B1 bis Heavy Tank, Revised 1-1-02 

 
 
 
 

Picture 1: 
The Char B1 was one of the largest French 
manufactured tanks to see service in WWII, 
originally beginning life as the Char B Heavy Tank 
in the early 1930s. There were actually three 
different Char B Heavy Tank proposals that were 
built in response to General Estienne's request for a 
tank weighing 14.75tons (15,000kg) and armed 
with a hull-mounted 47mm or 75mm gun. One 
vehicle was was submitted by FAMH (Forges et 
Aciéries da la Marine et d'Homécourt), one by 
FCM (Forges et Chantiers de la Méditerranée), and 
one from Renault/Schneider, all three completed in 
1929-1930. After trials were completed, it was 
decided that the new Char B tank would use the 
suspension design from FCM, the engine from 
Renault, and a transmission from Schneider. 
Production orders for the Char B were then placed 
with FAMH, FCM, and Renault with the Rueil 
Arsenal (ARL) coordinating the project.  
 
After minor modifications, the new tank went into 

series production as the Char B1, but only 35 were manufactured before the armor thickness was increased and a more 
powerful engine installed. With these changes and the original turret-mounted 37mm gun exchanged for a 47mm weapon, the 
Char B1 became the Char B1 bis; in French, 'bis' means (a). Over 360 of the Char B1 bis types were produced by the same 
manufacturers and as they rolled off the production lines they were then handed over to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th DCRs 
(Division Cuirassées de Réserve, the principal armored divisions in early 1940) and a further 57 went to other independent tank 
companies. This photo is credited from the E.C.P.A. in Paris.  
 
 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (1 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

 

Picture 2: 
This schematic drawing, slightly modified from the original from the Tank Museum at Bovington, England, provides us with 
some idea of the interior arrangement in the Char B1 bis. The tank had a crew of four-- driver/hull gunner, wireless operator, 
loader and commander. The hull of the tank was composed of cast armor sections and armor plate bolted together (cast armor 
was common in French tank design at that time). The driver was seated on the left side of the bow and the hull-mounted 75mm 
SA 35 howitzer was mounted to his right. Behind the driver was the radio operator and to his right was the loader. The radio in 
these vehicles was most likely the E.R. 53 Mle 1932 (E.R is Emetteur-Récepteur, or transmitter-receiver), with a 15km range. 
It was operated by telegraph key, broadcast on a frequency range of 40-100m, and weighed around 80kg. The commander was 
the sole occupant of the turret and the engine, transmission, and fuel tanks were all at the rear of the hull.  
 
 

Picture 3: 
The driver utilized a steering 
wheel to direct the vehicle, the 
wheel connected by a chain and 
control rod system to the Naeder 
hydrostatic steering system at the 
rear of the tank. Interestingly, the 
driver also doubled as the hull 
gunner, while the wireless 
operator, who had relatively little 
to do, was seated further back 
near the turret. The loader, who 
was seated behind the 75mm 
gun, was kept very busy loading 
the 75mm hull weapon and 
passing 47mm ammo up to the 
commander/gunner in the turret.  
 
The Naeder steering system 
provided very fine and precise 
directional control for gun 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (2 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

laying, this steering system being 
a fairly advanced regenerative 
controlled differential system. It 
provided for a graduated turning 
radius independent of the 
transmission gear chosen, a 
system known as hydrostatic. 

The driver's 75mm gun sight was mounted just below his forward episcope. These sights were prismatic binocular sights and 
they rotated behind a pair of vertical slits beneath the driver's scope. From the front of the vehicle these two slits are easily seen 
below the driver's main vision port. Another interesting feature of this tank was the gyroscopic direction indicator, driven by a 
compressor, and the same compressed air system also assisted in starting the engine when the normal electric starter failed.  
 
The Renault engine was set up so the clutch was at the rear of the power plant and it then directly transferred power to a five-
speed gearbox and then through a differential to both the rear sprockets. The Naeder hydrostatic steering pump sat on top of the 
gearbox and obtained its power from a chain drive takeoff from the main drive shaft, just before the gearbox. This type of 
steering system is also commonly called a double differential steering system, the design originally manufactured at the 
Schneider Company under the direction of E. Braillié in the early 1920s. The hydrostatic steering drive ('hydrostatic' is just 
another word for 'hydraulic') gave an infinity of turning radii for each gear of the gearbox, with the radii varying continuously, 
from the smallest possible radius in one direction to the smallest radius in the other. In its mid-position it held the steering input 
shaft stationary, preventing differential action between the tracks when running straight ahead.  
 
The steering was controlled by two clutches that transferred the power to the second differential (again, mounted on top of the 
main unit) and then to a set of cross-shafts running parallel to the main shafts. This second set of cross-shafts controlled the 
speed of the primary drive shafts because they rotated in the oppositely direction. In this way the Naeder system could slow 
either drive shaft that it was associated with and thereby slow the attached sprocket, the action depending on which of the 
steering clutches was engaged by the driver as he used the levers up at the front of the tank. Although it was complicated, the 
Naeder steering system allowed the small and precise corrections in steering that were necessary to accurately turn the vehicle 
just inches in one direction, allowing surprisingly accurate aiming of the hull-mounted 75mm gun.  
 
 

Picture 4: 
This is the view looking forward in the hull through the open 
engine compartment hatch in the firewall to the breech of the 
75mm howitzer mounted in the front glacis. The forward 
hull gun is the 75mm SA 35 with short barrel (only 17.1cal) 
which was installed in a mount that provided an elevation of 
+25 to -15 degrees. The howitzer was fixed in traverse, 
being aimed solely by the driver, in elevation by a hand 
wheel, and in traverse by turning the entire tank. Another 
unusual feature of the Char B1 bis was the use of the 
previously mentioned air compressor to blow fumes out the 
howitzer barrel after firing the gun and before opening the 
breech (an early fume extractor). The breech was of the 
horizontal sliding block type (shown open in this photo) and 
74 rounds of 75mm HE ammo was generally carried in 
storage bins/racks along the vehicle sides.  
 
Visible just below and to the right of the gun breech is the 
rear of the fixed 7.5mm Châtellerault Mle 1931 machine 
gun. This weapon was fired by the driver via a cable 
connection, which is not installed in this photograph. The 
same cable could be led up to the turret where the 
commander could also fire this MG. There were over 5,000 
rounds of MG ammo stored in 32 drums (or boxes) for both 
this weapon and the coaxial MG up in the turret; two typical 
150-round ammo drums used with the Châtellerault MG are 
seen here stowed above the 75mm gun mount. To our left is 
the Renault engine with its oil cleaner. The Char B1 bis was 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (3 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

powered by a Renault 6-cylinder, 307hp, gasoline engine providing around 17mph (28kph) with a range of 93 miles from a full 
tank of gas. This was an adaptation of an existing Renault aircraft engine with magneto ignition.  
 
 

 

Picture 5: 
The 7.5mm Châtellerault Mle (Model) 1931 machine gun was one of a number of MGs produced by the Manufacture d'Armes 
de Châtellerault, located in the French town of the same name. Their first success was actually in the development and 
production of a rimless cartridge better suited to automatic weapons than the typical 8mm rimmed Lebel rifle cartridge then in 
French service after WWI. The first MG developed around this cartridge was the Mle 1924, but it was redesigned after 
prototype failures upon demonstration and after its successful debut the gun became the Mle 24/29 and was quickly accepted 
into French Army service. In 1931, a modified version of the MG was developed and issued for use in the Maginot Line 
fortifications and this version used a side-mounted drum magazine containing 150 rounds as you see here. The same weapon 
was also used in a number of French manufactured tanks in the late 1930's, including our Char B1 bis. The Mle 24/29 and the 
31 were all used by the Germans after the fall of France in WWII, and indeed continued to be used by French Colonial Forces 
for many years after the war, being still found occasionally today in armies of former French colonies.  
 
 

Picture 6: 
This is a picture of the 75mm gun and mount 
next to a preserved museum Char B1 bis. The 
photo provides a better indication of the depth 
of the breech and a few details of the cradle 
and mechanism, including the trunions. The 
breech block is closed here and painted black, 
and the recuperator and recoil tubes at the top 
and bottom of the howitzer are also visible. 
Recall that the MG mounted near the 75mm 
gun was not installed in the gun mount, but 
was fixed to the hull to the right of the mount, 
and therefore it is not seen in this picture.  
 
The howitzer fired the HE shell Mle 1915 and 
the AP shell Mle 1910, weighing 5.550kg and 
6.400kg respectively. Muzzle velocity was 
around 490m/s and 470m/s, the HE shell filled 
with 740g of explosive. The AP shell is said to 
have been able to penetrate around 40mm of 
armor at 30 degrees obliquity at 400 meters, 

but the type of armor and other penetration data details are not available. The AP shell Mle 1910 was uncapped (non coiffé). 
The weapon had the same general design layout as the Mle 31 fortress gun, with the semi-automatic breech of the Mle 33 
fortress gun. Recoil length was 320mm and the rate of fire was as high as 15 rounds/minute.  
 
 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (4 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

Picture 7: 
Here is the view looking into 
a Char B1 bis preserved at 
the 

Saumur Armour Museum

 

showing the driver's position 
to our left and what is left of 
the 75mm gun breech to our 
right. The photo was taken by 
Mikel Ezcurra and loaned to 
AFV INTERIORS, and as 
you can see, much of the 
internal equipment is missing 
from this tank, including the 
recoil guard around the back 
of the gun. However, the 
driver's unique seat, viewing 
flap, and gun sight are still 
mostly intact, and the large 
75mm gun breech is also 
clear. An elevation hand 
wheel on the upper left corner 
of the gun mount allowed the 
gunner to lay the weapon 
correctly for elevation. Recall 
that this gun is a low velocity 

howitzer, and as such it was intended primarily for use as infantry support against non-armored targets and for indirect firing 
missions.  
 
You can see that the instrument panel in front of the steering wheel is devoid of all gages, and the one large gage on the wall to 
the driver's left (a tachometer?) is a modern addition. Notice also the emergency, or back-up hand brake levers (here painted 
red), one located on each side of the seat. The brake drums were mounted externally at each end of the auxiliary differential at 
the rear of the tank and they were operated with servo-assistance by these driver's hand brakes as well as a foot pedal. These 
levers and brakes could also be used for steering in an emergency. The Fieux centrifugal transmission had five forward and one 
reverse gear, and the driver changed gears by means of a shift lever mounted on the floor to his right. Down at his feet are the 
accelerator, brake, and clutch pedals, used in the typical way. Only the driver and the commander up in the turret were able to 
see out of the tank, one of the main drawbacks of this heavily armored vehicle. The floor is not original in this specimen and 
the paint has also been changed. French tanks were painted predominately white inside with most of the metal equipment black 
or some other primer color. The pale green hull walls and the red seat support are paint creations made by the museum staff.  
 
What is also clear here is the extensive use of bolts holding the rolled and cast armor pieces to the angle iron framing. The gun 
cradle is also bolted in place, the bolts seen surrounding the heavy mounting. One of the cables you see looping under the 
breech is the firing cable, leading from the elevation hand wheel near the driver to the firing mechanism attached to the right 
side of the breech block. The breech actuating handle is on the top of the breech ring.  
 
 

Picture 8: 
The APX turret was the same type as mounted on the SOUMA S-35, and 
because it was designed as a one-man turret, the commander was tasked with 
loading, aiming, and firing the turret weapons, as well as commanding the 
movement of the tank and actions of the tank crew. As with most one-man 
turrets, this was asking too much of the commander, and the resulting tactical 
use of the Char B1 bis suffered accordingly.  
 
As you can see from the photos and drawings, there were three primary entry/
exit hatches for the crew-- one on the right hull wall, one above the driver, and 
one on the right rear of the turret. But there were also two emergency escape 
hatches provided-- one on the belly of the tank and one in the roof of the 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (5 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

engine compartment. The engine, transmission and fuel tanks were all in the 
rear of the hull, and the engine was open to a passage way on the right side 
that led clear back to the rear armor plate. In the sponson to the left of the 
engine were the large radiator and fans, as well as a 100 liter gas tank. In the 
right sponson were two additional fuel tanks, one of 200 liters and one of 100. 
All these fuel tanks were self-sealing, but the 400 liters of fuel was dismally 
too little, leaving many tanks later stranded in combat due to lack of gasoline. 
Access to the passage on the left side of the engine was through a hatch in the 
firewall.  
 
Many of the 47mm rounds for the turret gun were stowed in racks in the back 
of this passageway; as far as I can tell there were no rounds stored up in the 
turret. The 75mm howitzer rounds were stored in tubes along both sides of the 
sponsons in the forward hull, while the larger tubes (with the holes) you see 
drawn along the bottom of the hull were for MG ammo drums.  
 
In May of 1940, each DCR had an establishment of four battalions of combat 

tanks, organized in a demi-brigade of two battalions of Char B1 heavy tanks and a demi-brigade of two battalions of much 
lighter tanks, in most cases H39 tanks. One of the only ways to identify the difference between the Char B1 and the Char B1 
bis is the longer gun tube of the 47mm SA 35 compared to the much shorter SA 34. Maximum armor thickness was also 
increased from 40mm to 60mm on the bis, but this is difficult to determine from photographs.  
 
 

Picture 9: 
Here is the view looking up into an AMX turret from below, 
illustrating the bottom of the 47mm gun and coaxial 7.5mm 
Reibel MG. The sights for the gunner are on the far left of all 
that hardware, near the coax MG, and the telescopic sight is 
provided with a padded eye cup to protect the gunner. Just 
below the sight is the butt of the coaxial Reibel MG, 
originally developed for the French infantry, with a range of 
around 2400m and a rate of fire of approximately 500 rounds/
minute. The breech of the 47mm SA Mle 35 gun is to the 
right of the coax MG.  
 
Barely visible in the photo is the shoulder pad that could be 
used to manually elevate the main weapon; it is attached to 
the recoil guard on the left side of the 47mm breech. The 
ability to disconnect the weapon cradle from the hand 
elevation wheel mechanism and elevate it manually by 
shoulder was common to both British and American AFV 
designs of the same time. It was believed that the gunner had 
a better chance of hitting a target while on the move using the 
shoulder lay than with a hand wheel. Fifty rounds of 47mm 
AP and HE could be carried in the tank, all stowed in the hull 
as I mentioned previously (some perhaps under the floor?), 
the ammo having to be handed up to the commander by the 
loader below. By the way, the coaxial turret Reibel MG could 
be independently traversed in its own ball mount an additional 
10 degrees to either side of center when required.  
 

There was no turret basket in the Char B1 bis heavy tank so the commander walked on the hull floor as the turret traversed 
(electrically or manually- the mechanism is partially obscured by a bar at the bottom of the photo). The turret had viewing 
blocks on both side walls, with a handle/lever beside each to open or close the protective armored cover (just visible at the 
lower right of the turret in the picture). There was also a large head pad on the ceiling of the turret over the gun sight, just 
visible here to the right of the cupola. The observation cupola is visible at the top of the picture and viewing blocks on both 
sides are evident, with another head pad at the center of the dome. There was also a large vision flap at the front of the cupola 
that could be opened and was protected with a glass block. There was no hatch in the cupola until the Germans added one in 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (6 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html

some of the vehicles they captured and later used.  
 
A few Char B1 bis tanks captured by the Germans in running order (nicknamed Kolosse by the Germans) were converted to 
flamethrower tanks and then officially named by them Pz.Kpfw. B-2 740(f). The flame gun replaced the 75mm main howitzer 
but the turret weapon was generally retained for its anti-tank capability.  
 
 

Picture 10: 
Our last image shows the interior of the same 
museum preserved Char B1 bis we saw earlier, 
again missing much of its equipment. Below is the 
left hull wall with part of the large engine air intake 
duct and radiator cover visible at the bottom. The 
radiator louvers on the left hull side were 
particularly attractive targets for anti-tank gunners 
and proved to be the weakest link in the Char B1 
bis armor. Up in the turret are the dark breeches 
and mounting cradles for the turret weapons, the 
turret currently pointing directly forward. One of 
the side vision flaps is also visible here, appearing 
black because it is opened. Up above is the 
commander's cupola; notice that the cupola is 
offset to the left of the turret roof. I believe the box 
you see on the turret ring (with the black manual 
hand wheel) is the traverse control, while the 
manual elevation hand wheel is seen off to the far 
right, attached to the gun cradle. The cradle is 
connected to the turret ceiling via a worm geared 
rod, and the handle you see here operates the worm 
gear, making the attached gun cradle climb or 
descend the rod, thereby depressing or elevating 
the gun.  
 
This 47mm SA 35 gun fired the French HE shell 
Mle 1932, weighing 1.415 kg, at approximately 

590 m/s. The AP round was the Mle 1935, 
weighing 1.500 kg, and traveling at around 700 m/s after leaving the gun tube. This was a "capped" round (coiffé sans f. ogive) 
and is said to have been capable of penetrating 40mm of armor at 400 meters at 30 degree obliquity. Rate of fire was the same 
as the 75mm gun, around 15 rounds/minute.  
 
By the way, the Renault 307 in-line engine used in the Char B1 bis was a direct cousin to the six-cylinder Renault-Deutsch 
engine that powered the French Caudron to a runaway win in the 1936 Thompson Trophy Race.  
 
My thanks to Mikel Ezcurra for loaning us a couple of his Char B1 bis photographs taken at the Saumur Museum. Other photos 
and drawings are from the Tank Museum, in Bovington, England. If you have additional information or illustrations concerning 
the interior of this interesting AFV and would be interested in sharing it with our readers, we would be delighted to hear from 
you.  
 
 

BACK TO AFV INTERIORS HOME PAGE

 

(c) 2001, 2003 AFV INTERIORS Web Magazine 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV...nteriors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/charb1/charb1.html (7 di 7)06/02/2007 19.42.43


Document Outline