background image

America (And The World) 

Faces Genuine 

Energy/Electricity Challenges

America (And The World) 

Faces Genuine 

Energy/Electricity Challenges

Global WINDPOWER 2004

Chicago, Illinois

March 31, 2004

Presented By:  

Matthew R. Simmons

Global WINDPOWER 2004

Chicago, Illinois

March 31, 2004

Presented By:  

Matthew R. Simmons

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Renewable Energy Soon To

Be Urgently Needed

Renewable Energy Soon To

Be Urgently Needed

n

For years, renewable energy 
was “clean energy luxury.”

n

Fossil fuels are now running 
into limits to growth.

n

It is now critical that renewable energy users 
understand their own limits to growth.

n

The future for wind must be bright.

n

The challenges might also be awesome.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

The Nub Of The Problem:

We Face An Energy Crisis

The Nub Of The Problem:

We Face An Energy Crisis

n

Future growth in electricity demand needs 
to shift from total reliance on natural gas.

n

Shift to oil does not work.

n

Coal and nuclear capacity now 
approximately 100%.

n

U.S. energy demand has to grow for U.S. 
to prosper.

n

Problems to grow energy use:  domestic oil 
and natural gas supply are both in decline.

n

The U.S. (and world) need a real 
substitution for both in order for demand to 
grow.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Energy Is The Heart And

Soul Of Our Economy

Energy Is The Heart And

Soul Of Our Economy

n

Petroleum creates our transportation.

n

Natural gas creates our “heat”.

n

Electricity is used in industrial, residential and 
commercial.

n

For economy to prosper, electricity must grow.

n

All future growth was supposed to happen 
through natural gas.

n

This assumption was wrong.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

America’s Electricity Is “Mother’s 

Milk” To Our Prosperity

America’s Electricity Is “Mother’s 

Milk” To Our Prosperity

n

A pearl in America’s prosperity has been our electric grid.

n

To grow U.S. GDP, electricity 
must grow.

n

We became one of few country’s 
to be totally electrified.

n

Blackouts were what Third World 
countries suffered.

n

To avoid blackouts, electricity generation and transmission 
need to exceed electricity demand.

n

While electricity was totally regulated, need to know 
electricity was limited.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

America’s Electricity Model Was Flawed

America’s Electricity Model Was Flawed

n

People assumed demand growth was waning.

n

Electricity deregulation would make industry 
“efficient”.

n

Electricity could be wheeled from “coast to coast”.

n

1,000 KW of capacity creates power for 1,000 homes.

n

It was safe to use one form of feedstock (natural gas) 
to fuel all future growth.

All assumptions were wrong!

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Electricity Demand Is Still Growing

Electricity Demand Is Still Growing

n

Historical demand facts:

1973 - 2002:  2.7% per annum growth

1998 - 2002:  1.6% per annum growth

n

Slowdown was primarily mild weather driven.

Average monthly use (1998) = 291,000 MMKW

Peak use (Summer 2002) = 381,500 MMKW

n

Electricity growth parallels GDP growth in normal 
weather.

n

If electricity growth stopped, so would GDP.

+31% or 

7% per annum

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Electricity Deregulation Was Flawed

Electricity Deregulation Was Flawed

n

Wheeling electricity assumes 
neighboring states do not share 
same peak weather uses.

n

As wheeling grows in distance, 
yield losses soar.

n

Deregulation used up 
“reserve margins”.

n

Free markets never intentionally create cushion (called 
reserve margins).

n

Electricity capacity is still tied to peak needs, not average 
needs.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

“1,000 KW Creates Power For 1,000 

Homes” Was Wrong

“1,000 KW Creates Power For 1,000 

Homes” Was Wrong

n

If true, America would only need 300,000 MW 
generating capacity.

110 million homes use 35% of U.S. power.

U.S. has 950,000 MW of total power capacity.

n

This standard was probably true 40 years ago.

n

Today, it understates generation needs by 
two-thirds.

n

Or generation added only fuels one-third as 
many homes as expected.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

In 1999, America Began A 

Power-Adding Binge

In 1999, America Began A 

Power-Adding Binge

n

1990’s:  Long standing habit of expanding 
power capacity ground to a halt.

n

Summer of 1999:  29 different blackouts / 
brownouts.

n

America then went on a “Power Buying Spree”.

n

220,000 MW added by end of 2003.

n

98% was gas-fired power plants.

n

America bets its future onto natural gas.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Some Think America Created

A Power Glut

Some Think America Created

A Power Glut

n

Many energy experts now assume 
America created massive power glut.

n

August 2003 blackout happened on 
only extremely muggy day.

n

Late February 2003 bitter weather sent 
power prices to $400 to 1,000 KW/hour 
across the U.S.

Simulated photo. Not true representation of the 

August 2003 blackout.

n

If we have too much generating capacity, we forgot to 
de-bottleneck transmission.

n

Spare capacity needs to be approximately 35% to 50%.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

America’s Bet On Natural Gas Was 

Sound (If Supply Had Worked)

America’s Bet On Natural Gas Was 

Sound (If Supply Had Worked)

n

Natural gas was a safe 
economic bet.

Most efficient way to create 
kilowatts.

Cheapest cost to build 
generating capacity.

Cleanest form of fossil fuel.

Only form that turns on instantly.

n

The bet was essential.

All other forms operate at 
effective 100% capacity.

Nuclear and coal take days to turn on.

Image courtesy of World Energy.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Supply Constraints Made The Bet Bad

Supply Constraints Made The Bet Bad

n

NPC study (1999/2000) saw need for 
supply to grow to 30 TCF.

n

NPC study (2003) shows how hard it will 
be to keep supply even flat through 2009.

n

Conventional natural gas peaked in 1973.

n

Non-conventional gains created illusion that flat 
supply in 1990s could grow if needed.

n

2000/2001 drilling boom shattered this dream.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Natural Gas Prices Have Become 

A “One-Way” Street

Natural Gas Prices Have Become 

A “One-Way” Street

n

Commodity core assumptions:

High prices create surge in supply.

High prices also depress demand.

Low prices depress supply.

Low prices encourage greater demand.

n

This “thesis” underpins why commodities are 
“commodating.”

n

High natural gas prices stimulate more “planting”
but not genuine supply growth.

n

If prices fall, supply also falls.  (A one-say street)

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

“Quo Vadis” Natural Gas Supply?

“Quo Vadis” Natural Gas Supply?

n

Conventional gas supplies are in steep decline.

New vintage gas wells decline by 40-50% in one year.

When production is > 10% of peak, final decline is 
slow.

n

Oilfield technology revolution accelerated ability 
to drain proved reserves.

n

Conventional gas supply peaked in 1973 at 
63 bcf/day.

n

It is probably approximately 25 to 30 bcf/day 
now.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Creating Net Growth By 

Non-Conventional Supply Is Tough

Creating Net Growth By 

Non-Conventional Supply Is Tough

n

All non-conventional sources are 
“non-conventional”.

n

Arctic gas has hurdles to overcome.

Proved North Slope gas is now injected.

McKenzie Delta gas “found” is not great.

Exploration in Arctic has been tough.

n

CBM/Tight Sands gas is small/wellhead.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

LNG’s Future Is Bright 

(But Tough To Grow Fast)

LNG’s Future Is Bright 

(But Tough To Grow Fast)

n

Global LNG markets are experiencing “Renaissance”.

n

U.S. was last to get aboard a fast moving train.

n

Why U.S. landed LNG has to grow.

 

2010 To 

2015 

 

(Bcf/day) 

Implicit Demand 

90 

Probably U.S. Supply 

40 

Canadian/Arctic/Current LNG 

    10 

Shortfall 

40 

 

ConocoPhillips Qatar Gas III:  $5 billion for 1 bcf/day 

of gas (in 2010).  This is 2.5% of our need.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Adequacy Of Global Natural Gas 

Supply Is “Hazy”

Adequacy Of Global Natural Gas 

Supply Is “Hazy”

n

All long-term global energy forecasts assume gas 
demand will soar (and offset any surprises in oil supply).

n

Everyone assumes global gas supply is fabulous, 
though stranded.

98% of “stranded” gas has never seen a drill bit.

Undrilled structures are not proved reserves.

n

65% of current global gas supply is in decline.

U.S./Canadian gas

Most of Russia’s gas

U.K. gas

Indonesian gas

Netherlands gas

If 2/3 of supply in decline, hard 

for total growth to be high.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

How Did We Get Into This Energy Mess?

How Did We Get Into This Energy Mess?

n

Energy prices were “too low for too long”.

n

Low prices created illusion about energy security.

n

Low prices encouraged growth in demand.

n

Low prices inhibited growth of supply.

n

Supply growth might have ended 
anyway.

n

Two decades of low energy prices took 
a painful toll on energy sustainability, 
let alone growth.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

What Will Future Energy Prices Be?

What Will Future Energy Prices Be?

n

For two decades, conventional energy wisdom 
has assumed “prices are set to fall”.

n

Low prices inhibited any 
supply growth and 
stimulated energy demand.

n

There is no knowledge on 
“replacement cost of a barrel of oil”.

n

Current prices are still too low.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Global Energy Issues Are 

Extremely Complex

Global Energy Issues Are 

Extremely Complex

n

Worldwide oil demand at record high (exceeded 
83 million b/d).

n

Natural gas and oil demand expected/needs to grow 
by two-thirds over next 25 years.

n

World oil supplies are peaking.

n

Natural gas supplies could also peak.

n

This does not mean we have run out of either energy 
source.

n

It does mean supply growth ends.

n

These are complex and serious issues.

background image

S

IMMONS

& C

OMPANY

INTERNATIONAL

Investment

Bankers

to the

E

nergy

Industry