Harvard Business Review Online | What Venture Trends Can Tell You
Click here to visit:
What Venture Trends Can Tell You
The venture capital industry is in for a shakeout—and smart
outsiders are watching.
by William F. Meehan III, Ron Lemmens, and Matthew R. Cohler
William F. Meehan III is a director in McKinsey & Company’s San Francisco office; Ron Lemmens, an alumnus of that office, is a
senior vice president at GE Consumer Finance in Stamford, Connecticut; Matthew R. Cohler is a consultant in McKinsey’s Silicon
Valley office.
You can get whiplash watching the venture capital industry. Annual U.S. VC investments rocketed from under
$10 billion in the early 1990s to over $100 billion in 2000, then plunged back toward earth when the bubble
burst. It’s not going to be a soft landing. With annual investments now well below $25 billion, our projections
show that a gradual shakeout is likely—one that in the worst case could force up to half of all current VC firms to
close shop over the next several years.
Drawing on public and proprietary data, we analyzed past correlations of VC investments and returns with
changes in GDP, Nasdaq returns, and productivity. Using statistical models, we applied those correlations to
hypothetical future scenarios, yielding three projections for venture investment levels over the next three to five
years. (See the exhibit “Predicting Venture Investments.”)
Predicting Venture Investments
Sidebar F0307D_A (Located at the end of this
article)
Even the most optimistic projection suggests that the VC industry can profitably absorb no more than $15 billion
to $20 billion in annual investment during the next several years. The two other projections, which we think are
more realistic, suggest even less capacity for investment, between $5 billion and $15 billion annually. Currently,
the industry is awash in money and is struggling to invest or return to limited partners an $86 billion capital
overhang, or cumulative excess in uninvested capital. The shrinking capacity to absorb investment, combined
with this excess supply of capital, will likely lead to lower overall returns and an inexorable, gradual shakeout of
existing venture firms. Most vulnerable are firms that raised their first funds during the bubble, a group that
included 25% of all U.S. venture firms by the end of 2001. Nonetheless, history suggests that older, established
firms are not immune.
Following the behavior and fate of the VC industry is important to executives outside the venture capital
community as well as to industry insiders. For decades, venture capital has been a critical force in—and a
leading indicator of—business innovation. VC investment activity provides outsiders with early signs of key
trends emerging in high tech, communications, and biotechnology. These early signs can help executives
monitor technology transitions that may fundamentally disrupt business processes and can, in some industries,
help them track the growth of potential competitors and acquisition targets.
The conspicuous flow of venture capital into semiconductors and computer hardware in the early 1980s, for
example, represented nearly 50% of all venture deals in the first half of that decade, foreshadowing the rapid
expansion of business computing throughout the U.S. economy that followed. Similarly, the recent growth of VC
investment in biotechnology and medical devices—22% of all venture funding in 2002 versus just 6% to 13% in
the bubble years—presages the growing importance of life sciences for both medical and industrial applications.
http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b02/en/hbr/hbrsa/current/0307/article/F0307DPrint.jhtml (1 of 2) [01-Jul-03 17:48:12]
