background image

Harvard Business Review Online | The Turning of Atlanta

 

Click here to visit:  

>| http://www.hbsp.org

 

 

 

 

 

The Turning of Atlanta

 

 

What does it take to rescue a city from financial catastrophe? 

Complete openness, obsessive performance tracking, and 

unprecedented access to the woman in charge. 

 

 

A Conversation with Shirley Franklin 

 

Shirley Franklin and Leigh Buchanan  

 

Shirley Franklin knows how to execute a turnaround. Sworn in as the first female mayor of Atlanta in 2001, 

Franklin expected that operations would need improvement. But she believed the city could at least pay its bills. 

Instead, her administration uncovered an $82 million budget gap—amounting to 20% of the general fund 

operating budget—and a negative balance in the reserve account. Oh yes, and she had just 60 days in which to 

balance the budget before incurring more debt. 

Franklin responded with tough measures that included laying off approximately 800 people—an eighth of the 

city’s government employees—and raising property taxes by nearly 50%. Today, Atlanta still has challenges 

(homelessness and a dilapidated sewer system, for instance), but it is at least on the road to financial stability. 

Meanwhile, Franklin’s courage, style, and tactics have won acclaim from pundits and the public alike. In this 

conversation with Senior Editor Leigh Buchanan, edited here for length, Franklin describes how she’s managing 

Atlanta’s recovery.

When you’re leading a turnaround, the problems can look insurmountable. How do you begin to 

tackle them? 

When I came into office, I didn’t realize how dysfunctional city hall had become. Ten years earlier, I had been 

Mayor Maynard Jackson’s chief officer for operations, and when I left, well, things weren’t perfect, but at least 

they worked. The hardest thing for me was seeing how bad things had become. The city was flat broke, 

employee morale was in the basement, and the public had lost faith. 

I’ve worked for two mayors, and they taught me that the time to make the hard decisions is as soon as you 

know you have to make them. If you waste time getting worked up about a situation, you run the risk that 

people, particularly at senior levels, will start doubting your conviction to change it. You have to set the tone 

early. Then you have to focus on the most critical issues relentlessly. For us, the turnaround plan and weekly 

progress reviews have been critical. 

Who were the key people you needed to get on board to start the turnaround? 

We needed everyone: the public—who are our customers, the city council, business leaders, the media. And 

there was so much cynicism and disillusionment. So we had to convince them by being open and straightforward 

about city finances and operations. I mean, we chased the members of the press more than they chased us. We 

called reporters every day to tell them what we were finding. We gave full copies of every report to the media 

and the business community, and we invited them to analyze what we were saying and to judge whether we 

were making the right decisions. 

Who led the turnaround on the inside? 

I was very involved with the short-term response as part of a small team of six people. It’s important to keep 

the number of participants down when you’re first trying to understand the problems. There’s not a lot of time to 

go out and find people you can have confidence in. And since this was a government that had shown no financial 

 

http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b0...2CPrint.jhtml;jsessionid=XC044ENYOO54CCTEQENSELQ (1 of 3) [01-Dec-03 18:53:21]

background image

Harvard Business Review Online | The Turning of Atlanta

restraint, by keeping the team small we were able to maintain accountability and a level of discipline that might 

not have been possible with a larger group. 

We’ve moved on to medium- and long-term strategies, overhauling every operation from airport expansion to 

zoning. To do that, we’ve had to bring on additional budget and organizational expertise. That larger team has 

allowed us to address more than one problem at a time. We’ve also kept the core group together, and we have a 

senior team dedicated to managing our consultants. Otherwise, we couldn’t have managed both the day-to-day 

operations and the turnaround at the same time. 

How do you inflict necessary pain, such as layoffs, on an organization that may already be 

demoralized, yet still extract strong performance? 

First, you have to show there’s no alternative. We did that through rigorous, transparent analysis of the budget 

and operations as well as through benchmark comparisons with other cities. It’s also important to lead by 

example. I wasn’t going to ask anyone to do anything I wouldn’t do myself, so I cut my own salary and my own 

staff. And I’ve tried to make myself as accessible as possible. 

One way I do that is through Mayor’s Night In. One night every other month, city employees can come and see 

me without an appointment and get five minutes one-on-one. They tell me the things that make their jobs hard 

or frustrating. A lot of the complaints are about inadequate training or equipment. Some have reported crimes 

or corruption in their departments. We guarantee them absolute confidentiality. I have an assistant in the room 

with me, and whatever the problem is, it goes into our case management system and gets resolved. This helps 

employees, but it also helps us identify poor supervisors or corruption. And it gives me direct knowledge about 

what’s really going on. 

We do the same thing for citizens. One night every two months, they can come and talk to me about anything. 

It can be a child who wants to do an interview for a class project, or a young entrepreneur who wants an idea on 

how to position his company, or someone complaining about a service she hasn’t received. My accessibility and 

willingness to listen make people—both employees and the public—more receptive to change. 

How do you measure how well you’re succeeding? Do you use the same metrics internally that you 

show to the public? 

We use several approaches. First, nearly every week, we measure our progress against the objectives of the 

turnaround plan. The small, core team meets on Mondays to review the past week and talk about specific 

deliverables for the weeks to come. Second, we use a Web-based management dashboard that sets the 

standard for our performance in each area of government operation, from tonnage of trash picked up, to the 

length of time it takes to get a building permit. It shouldn’t take more than 72 hours to fill a pothole or more 

than 12 hours to find shelter for a homeless person. Crime statistics are normally released annually when a city 

reports them to the FBI. We do it every 30 days. There are hundreds of categories, and the same information 

goes up on the internal system and on our public Web site. 

Even as you’re wrangling with the budget, Atlanta still faces enormous challenges. How do you begin 

to focus your attention on the long term? 

We hold regular cabinet and department-level retreats and encourage people to talk about where they think 

Atlanta should go. Obviously, some time needs to be spent on routine, maintenance-type discussions, but 

people need to know you value their creativity. 

In addition, every quarter, the COO and I hold two- to three-hour meetings with each of the department 

managers and key players on important initiatives. We step away from the management dashboard, the 

turnaround plan, and the budget process and discuss the things keeping these people up at night. For example, 

we worry a lot about drinking water and waste water operations right now, but we talk very little about our 

water sources 30 years from now. This administration won’t be here then, but if we don’t start talking about it, 

some future administration will wonder why we didn’t. 

We strive to find a balance between day-to-day management, dealing with crises, and scheduled open-ended 

discussions about strategic issues and plans. The idea is to make people feel comfortable enough to take risks 

and think big.

 

Reprint Number F0312C

 

http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b0...2CPrint.jhtml;jsessionid=XC044ENYOO54CCTEQENSELQ (2 of 3) [01-Dec-03 18:53:21]

background image

Harvard Business Review Online | The Turning of Atlanta

Copyright © 2003 Harvard Business School Publishing.

This content may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or 

mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without 

written permission. Requests for permission should be directed to permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu, 1-

888-500-1020, or mailed to Permissions, Harvard Business School Publishing, 60 Harvard Way, 

Boston, MA 02163.

http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b0...2CPrint.jhtml;jsessionid=XC044ENYOO54CCTEQENSELQ (3 of 3) [01-Dec-03 18:53:21]


Document Outline