background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

WWI Medium Mark A Tank, "Whippet" 

 
 

 

Picture 1: 
The British Medium Mark A tank was a fast and lightly armed vehicle designed to exploit breakthroughs. 
Manufactured by William Foster & Company Ltd., of Lincoln, the Mark A's crew of three included a driver, 
commander, and one or two machine gunners who manned a total of four Hotchkiss MGs. It was in 1915 that the 
engineering firm of William Foster & Co. Ltd. invented and produced the first tanks for Britain. Most of the 
direction of that work was by the firm's General Manager, William Tritton, who was knighted in 1917 for this 
work. Powered by two 45hp Tylor engines (each engine powered one track) the "Whippet", named after a popular 
racing dog, could attain unheard of speeds of 9mph on roads, which was darn fast for tanks at that time. Armor 
thickness ranged from 5-14mm, the armor bolted and riveted to a steel framework and purposely kept light to 
allow for increased speed. The crews of the Medium Mark As saw their first combat during the battles around 
Armiens in April of 1918.  
 
Our first illustration shows the left side view of the interior-- yes, the front of the tank is to the left. The driver's 
seat is situated centrally in the taller portion of the vehicle which was called a turret (even though it did not rotate), 
or cab, while the twin engines, fans, radiator, and fuel tank occupied most of the forward part of the hull. Notice 
that the cylindrical fuel tank is mounted at the very front of the hull, perhaps not the best position in an otherwise 
fairly well laid-out design. Directly behind the fuel tank is the radiator, and the large fan shroud lies directly 
behind the radiator, the shroud housing two fans chain driven from the engines. The only other major problem 
with Sir William Tritton's design, beside the forward mounted gas tank, was the use of two engines, each driving 
only the track on that side of the vehicle. Internal combustion gasoline engines were not very reliable at that time, 
even though these were two four-cylinder, in-line, commercial Tylor bus engines. Keep in mind that if an engine 
were to stall or fail, the tank would only be able to circle, as only one track would then be powered, until the 
stalled engine was restarted.  
 
The only armament were Hotchkiss machine guns which could be mounted in the front, rear and sides of the 
turret, the guns being supported in pivoting ball mounts. The sole crew access into the tank was via a door at the 
back, next to the rear machine gun mount, although there was a small observation hatch on the roof that the 
commander could use for observing the surroundings.  
 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (1 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

 

Picture 2: 
We have just a few interior photographs of the Whippet, so I have reproduced them in large format so you can see 
the most detail from each. This particular Whippet was photographed by Franck Soulier at the Royal Army and 
Military History Museum, Brussels, Belgium. We are most fortunate that this tank has not been "reconditioned" so 
it is in the same condition that it was when knocked out in 1918. As far as Franck can determine, the vehicle has 
not been repaired nor repainted.  
 
This first photo illustrates the driver's seat at the center right side of the fighting compartment as well as the 
forward machine gun position to the left of the driver. The turret is not semetrical in shaped when viewed from 
above. As you can see here, the left side of the front armor (where the MG is mounted) juts out forward, and the 
right side of the front armor therefore is positioned further back near where the driver sits. There is a forward 
vision slit for the driver with a rotating cover that is located directly in front of his face, and the cover can be 
opened to any of a number of different positions depending on need and conditions. Note that the extended 
forward-left side of the cab obscures the driver's view in that direction. In the photo you can see that his seat 
appears to be covered in leather or a canvas fabric, and looking forward from the seat you can see the brake levers 
for each sprocket as well as the handles of the gearshifts.  
 
The driver normally steered the Whippet using a small steering wheel. Only the lower portion of the wheel is still 
intact in this particular vehicle and you can see the wheel and its shaft angling up towards us, located between the 
steering brake handles. The steering wheel shaft attached, via control links, to throttles on the carburetors of each 
engine. By turning the wheel in one direction, you increased the speed of the opposite engine. That increased the 
speed of the tracks on that side, subsequently steering the tank into the direction you turned the wheel. This 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (2 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

steering design, developed by Sir Tritton, was designed to avoid the loss of power found in the British heavy tanks 
that occurred when a track was hand braked during a normal skid turn. However, driving the Medium Mark A was 
still no picnic, first because it was one of the first British tanks with only one driver, and second because the driver 
had to control both engines, while steering the vehicle with the wheel or manual braking levers. Notice the small 
peephole on the right side of the hull, placed so the driver had a view (although restricted) out that side of the tank. 
The oblong, rotating peephole cover is on the outside of the armor, as it is for most of these small peepholes on the 
Whippet. Looking down and forward from the driver's seat, you can see twin foot pedals as well as the opening 
leading to the engine compartment forward of the turret/cab area.  
 
The ball mount for the .303in Hotchkiss MG is clear at the upper left of the photo, and a large bin for MG ammo 
boxes sits directly below. These boxes were generally made of wood with handles on the ends-- you may recall 
that Hotchkiss MGs used strip ammo feed, and the boxes held strips side by side, two strips wide. I suspect the 
large hand crank you see was a starter handle, probably used mainly for restarting the engines after one had 
stalled. There was also access for hand starting the tank outside the vehicle, from the rear of the cab.  
 
 

Picture 3: 
This view offers us 
more detail below 
the driver's seat 
where the right 
gearbox is located. 
The gearbox for the 
left engine is off to 
our left, just out of 
view. There was a 
wood floor in the 
fighting 
compartment, which 
is completely 
missing here, and 
normally the 
commander stood at 
this position, able to 
look out of the 
vehicle through a 
roof hatch directly 
above. Located on 
the driveshaft 
between each engine 
and its gearbox is a 
large flywheel, 
located just on the 
other side of the 
forward partition 
you see here. The 
second driveshaft 
that left the other 
side of the four-
speed, constant 
mesh gearbox then 
proceeded on to a 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (3 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

final drive via a 
worm gear. From 
the final drive there 
was a chain drive 
that brought the 

torque further to the rear of the hull to the rear drive sprockets. The chain drive is not drawn in the earlier diagram. 
Again, remember that each engine is only connected to the drive sprocket on that side of the tank.  
 
Major W. H. L. Watson was a tank commander in a Mark A Medium during WWI and following are some of his 
recollections about a Whippet attack during the spring 1918 offensive. "All the tanks, except Morris's, had arrived 
without incident at the railway embankment. Morris ditched on the bank and was a little late. Haigh and Jumbo 
had gone on ahead of the tanks. They crawled out beyond the embankment into No Man's Land and marked out 
the starting-line. It was not too pleasant a job. The enemy machine-guns were active right through the night, and 
the neighbourhood of the embankment was shelled intermittently."  
 
"Skinner's tank failed on the embankment. The remainder crossed it successfully and lined up for the attack just 
before zero. By this time the shelling had become severe. The crews waited inside their tanks, wondering if they 
would be hit before they started. Already they were dead-tired, for they had obtained little sleep since the long 
painful trek of the night before. Suddenly our bombardment begun - it was more of a bombardment than a barrage 
- and the tanks crawled away into the darkness. On the extreme right Morris and Puttock were met by tremendous 
machine-gun fire at the wire of the Hindenburg Line. They swung to the right, as they had been ordered, and 
glided along in front of the wire, sweeping the parapet with their fire. Serious clutch trouble developed in 
Puttock's tank. It was impossible to stop since the German guns were following them."  
 
"Money's tank reached the German wire. His men must have 'missed their gears'. For less than a minute the tank 
was motionless, then she burst into flames. A shell had exploded the petrol tanks. A sergeant and two men 
escaped. Money, best of good fellows, must have been killed instantaneously by the shell. Puttock's clutch was 
slipping so badly that the tank would not move, and the shells were falling ominously near. He withdrew his crew 
from the tank into a trench, and a moment later the tank was hit again." The quote is from Martin Gilbert's book, 
"First World War" (May 1996, Henry Holt Publishers, ISBN: 0805047344).  
 
 

Picture 4: 
There isn't much remaining of the 
driver's seat padding, but what little of 
it that is left you can see in this photo. 
Again, the brake levers are visible on 
either side of the seat, and now the 
ammo bin and MG ball mount on the 
right side of the hull are also visible. 
Once the Whippet saw its first action 
in the spring of 1918 it was more or 
less in continuous use until the end of 
the war. Perhaps as many as 200 
machines were constructed and those 
that were not scrapped after the war 
were sold to Japan and Russia.  
 
Although turning the tank was 
generally accomplished by turning the 
steering wheel, straight driving was 
normally accomplished by the driver 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (4 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

locking both output shafts by a splined 
sleeve, therefore eliminating any 
steering at all. All and all, the steering 
system was very difficult to manage 
for one man, and as I mentioned 
earlier, stalled engines and constantly 
circling Whippets were not rare 
occurrences. On the other hand, the 
Whippet was the first production 
British tank with a turret (sometimes 
also called a barbette), although non-
rotating. Range for the Whippet tank 
that was intended as a breakthrough 

exploitation machine was only 40miles (70 imperial gallons in the fuel tank). Crews liked more range, so you will 
often see numerous gasoline tins strapped on the outside of the hull.  
 
 

Picture 5: 
Another picture of the right side of the 
tank turret interior gives some 
additional detail of the relatively 
simple ball mount for the MG. The 
pin hanging on the chain to the left of 
the mount was inserted through the 
mount and MG and held it in place. 
Some sources record that there were 
as many as 5,400 rounds of MG 
ammo stored in the shelves. Viewing 
of the fall of MG tracer rounds was 
only possible by opening the peep you 
see above the ball mount, the round 
plate simply rotating out of the way. 
Notice the bent armor plate visible to 
our far right. The turret's right-rear 
armor panel sustained a direct hit from 
a large caliber artillery round that 
splintered and penetrated the armor. 
We will see a view of this damage 
from outside the vehicle a bit later.  
 
As I mentioned earlier, normal 
steering was accomplished by using 
the small steering wheel and varying 
the speed of either engine/track. For 
tight turns it was possible to place one 
of the gearboxes in neutral and then 
make a neutral turn. For an even 
tighter turn, you could even apply the 
hand brake to that same neutral track 
if necessary. By the way, this is also 

an excellent view of the angle iron 
frame that supported the large armor plates, the plates either bolted or riveted in place.  

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (5 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

 
 

Picture 6: 
The left side MG mount is identical to the others, and in this photograph is also another ammo bin as well as some 
storage brackets on the angled left rear wall. In addition, the internal peep cover plate has been partially rotated 
and you can see the vision slot now exposed in the armor plate. The clips you see on the wall may have been used 
for storing the Hotchkiss MGs when they were not in use, but that's just speculation on my part. There is 
additional information concerning the Hotchkiss MGs that were used in the Whippet in other pages of AFV 
INTERIORS Web Magazine, such as the page on the 

French Saint Chamond tank

.  

 
 

Picture 7: 
The rear door is open on this museum-
preserved Whippet and this is the detail 
of the inside surface. The ball mount is 
missing its MG securing pin, but the 
handle below the mount that helped 
steady the gunner is clearly visible. 
Again, there is a peep lookout above the 
ball mount and it opens in the same 
manner as the others we have seen. 
Inside the vehicle is visible some of the 
ammo bin that was bolted to the right 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (6 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

rear corner of the tank. Next to this bin is 
a second bin used to store crew 
equipment that has no shelves.  
 
The British introduced tank warfare to 
the world on the Somme battlefield, 
using their Mark I tanks, on September 
23, 1916. The following year the massed 
tank attack at Cambrai failed partially 
because the heavy tanks had been unable 
to continue their breakthrough advance. 
Eventually, most of the hard fought 
ground was once again lost to the 
Germans in counter attacks, and this was 
very hard to accept by the officers that 
had been involved. There was much 
letter writing and finger pointing, and so 
it was in December of 1917 that the 
Ministry of Munitions authorized 
production of the Medium Mark A 
Whippet as a true exploitation tank. 
Incidentally, one of the ways that you 
can determine that the Whippet was 
manufactured late in the war is the 
presence of ball mounts for the machine 

guns. MG mounts in earlier heavy tanks used a simple slit in the armor for firing access, and enemy return fire 
often penetrated the openings and seriously injured the occupants.  
 
Similar to earlier tank designs, there was no protective firewall between the engine and crew compartments in the 
Medium Mark A. The cramped three or four-man crew was therefore exposed not only to the noxious gases 
produced by the twin bus/truck engines and gearboxes, but also to the heat and tremendous noise, just a few feet 
away. The follow-on design to the Medium Mark A "Whippet" was the Medium Mark B (also called Whippet on 
occasion), and it did finally separate the engine and fighting compartment with a genuine firewall, much to the 
relief of the crew.  
 
 

Picture 8: 
This is the penetration damage I mentioned 
earlier, the full impact of the piercing round 
evident from the shattered plates and spalling 
you see radiating out around it. This must have 
been a catastrophic hit for the crew if they were 
inside at the time, and the hit explains the 
discoloring inside the tank. Interestingly, the 
penetration does not seem to have resulted in 
an internal fire. The open rear door is to our 
left.  
 
The Whippet suspension was unsprung, that is 
the boogies were bolted directly to the hull and 
carrier rail. The boogies consisted of twenty 
rollers on the bottom run to carry the weight, 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (7 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

while other lighter rollers were provided on the 
top run to carry the track back again. The use 
of return rollers on the Whippet is in stark 
contrast to the purely slide track return method 
used on British heavy tanks at that time, which 
was much nosier and harder on the material in 
contact. The track shoes, or plates, on the 
Medium Mark A were 20.5in wide and similar 
in design to those of the British heavy tanks, 
but they were also lighter in construction. The 
tracks were designed for the addition of special 
metal and wood spuds to deal with unusually 
heavy going, and in some photos you will see 
the wooden spuds hanging side by side on the 
hull, appearing like so many wooden blocks 
lined up along the hull.  

 
 

Picture 9: 
Our final interior 
photo of the vehicle 
from the Danish 
Military Museum 
brings us back to the 
front of the cab 
again. Both forward 
and left side MG 
ammo bins are 
visible here, as well 
as the second 
gearbox located 
below us, visible 
because the wooden 
floor is missing.  
 
From what I have 
seen in period 
photographs, British 
tank crew uniforms 
seem to have 
changed a couple of 
times during the 
Great War. By the 
time the Whippet 
went into action in 
1918 most crews are 
seen to be wearing a 
drab light brown or 
perhaps tan overall, 
typically with the 
common steel 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (8 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

helmet, and 
normally their dress 
tunic worn over the 
overall. Regulation 
leather equipment 
belts of the 1916 
issue were also worn 
throughout the war 

over the tunic. In warm weather you will also see photos of tank crewmen wearing khaki shorts with puttees and 
boots. Almost always present and part of the official uniform were the large gas mask satchels worn around 
tankers necks, as the danger of gassing was an ever-present danger to tankers also.  
 
Inside the satchel was a canister gas mask, which was originally developed in England to protect soldiers from 
chlorine gas and other tearing agents such as xylyl bromide. These masks were not able to filter the more deadly 
phosgene and diphosgene gases. And, there were no masks for any soldiers in the Great War that could protect 
them from the feared mustard gas, which attacked all flesh that happened to be exposed at the time. It has been 
written that in 1918 a German corporal, Adolf Hitler, was temporarily blinded by a British gas attack in Flanders. 
Having suffered the agonies of being gassed himself, Hitler's fear of gas attacks may have deterred him from 
deploying it as a tactical weapon on the battlefields of WWII.  
 
 

Picture 10: 
Although the Germans were the first to 
introduce gas onto the battlefields of WWI in 
1915, it didn't take long for the other 
belligerents to follow suit. At that time there 
were two ways to gas your enemies, either by 
cylinders or by projectiles. The cylinder 
attack required bringing a large number of gas 
cylinders up to the line and then running pipes 
from these as far forward into No-Man's Land 
as possible. When the wind was just right, a 
dense cloud of gas could be released that 
would envelope a large section of the 
defensive trenches. Of course, the wind was a 
distinct disadvantage for the Germans, as 
prevailing winds across France are typically 
from the west to the east, against them. The 
primary gasses used through the first half of 
the war were phosgene and chlorine.  
 
The second method of gas attack required 
projectiles to be fired from guns or trench 
mortars. This method did not require as much 
reliance on the wind, and rear areas could also 
be attacked, but heavy bombardments were 

also generally required. By the time the Whippet came into the war, mustard gas had become the most prevalent 
gas weapon. It has been estimated by British sources that as many as 160,000 of their soldiers were incapacitated 
and as many as 4,000 killed by mustard gas attacks from the July 1917 to November 1918.  
 
The typical British Model 1917 small box respirator and carrying satchel are on the left; it was the most common 
gas mask in British use at the time, both for infantry and armor units. It had replaceable, non-splintering eyepieces 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (9 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52

background image

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AFV%20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html

as well as a breathing outlet valve, and was therefore more comfortable to wear than its German counterpart. In 
fact, the model 1917 was probably the best gas mask of the war, and it was generally proof against all gasses 
except, of course, mustard. That is because mustard gas is a vesicant gas, causing blistering on skin contact, and it 
does not have to be breathed into the lungs to be effective. The small box filtering unit is seen at the right, and in 
this case there appears to have been a second filter added at the bottom. The design of this mask was for the user 
to breath in and out normally, breathing in through the filter box and out via the valve mentioned earlier, located 
where the hose attached to the mask.  
 
 

Picture 11: 
Although plagued with more than its fair share of mechanical problems due to the unique layout of the twin bus 
engines and the driver's controls, the Whippet was an effective, if short-lived tank and played an important role 
during the final years of WWI. Like most early tank designs, it provided a terribly uncomfortable ride for the crew 
and its purposely-designed short hull (required to reduce weight) created a tendency for vertical oscillations that 
was a bit like riding high waves at sea. The particular Whippets illustrated in this photograph are part of the 3rd 
Battalion at Maillet Mailly, France, March 30, 1918. They are accompanying infantry of the New Zealand 
Division. The photo is from the 

Imperial War Museum

 files.  

 
My thanks again to Franck Soulier for loaning us his photos of the Whippet preserved in the collection of the 

Royal Army and Military History Museum

 in Brussels, Belgium. Should you have additional information about 

the interior of the Medium Mark A, we would be interested in sharing it with out readers. There is currently not 
much material available on the Whippet, and we all hope this page continues to grow over time as additional 
information is added.  
 
 

BACK TO AFV INTERIORS HOME PAGE

 

(c) 2002, 2003 AFV INTERIORS Web Magazine 

file:///H|/Modellismo/AFV%20Interiors/[armor]%20-%20AF...20Interiors/afvinteriors.hobbyvista.com/whip/whip.html (10 di 10)07/02/2007 23.31.52


Document Outline