background image

PALAEOANTHROPOLOGY

The coast in colour 

Sally McBrearty and Chris Stringer

A South African cave overlooking the Indian Ocean was apparently a desirable residence for early 
humans. The site has provided rich evidence for the early use of colour and marine resources. 

On the basis of both fossil and genetic data, 
we know that Homo sapiens had evolved in 
Africa by 150,000–200,000 years ago. But the 
time and manner of human behavioural evolu-
tion are less clear. Exploiting marine resources, 
producing complex technology and manipu-
lating symbols are all symptomatic of modern 
human activity. When did such behaviours 
appear, and how did the process relate to the 
morphological evolution of our species?  

On page 905 of this issue, Marean et al.

1

 

provide strong evidence that early humans 
displayed key elements of modern behaviour 
as far back as 165,000 years ago at Pinnacle 
Point on the coast of South Africa (Fig. 1). The 
evidence is in the form of shellfish, haematite 
(red ochre) used as a colouring agent, and 
small stone ‘bladelets’. The site provides a rare 

glimpse into human adaptation to coastal con-
ditions during a time for which most evidence 
elsewhere has been scuttled by subsequent rises 
in sea level. 

The earliest unequivocal fossils of H. sapiens 

are crania from Ethiopian sites at Omo Kibish 
and Herto, respectively dated to about 195,000 
and 160,000 years ago. Genetic estimates

2

 for 

the origin of our species also lie in the interval 
100,000–200,000 years ago. But the behavioural 
repertoire and precise geographical range of 
these early human populations in Africa are 
unevenly documented.

There are two distinct views about the rela-

tionship between anatomical and behavioural 
evolution in early H. sapiens. Some work-
ers favour a late and rather sudden origin 
for behavioural modernity, dating to around 

45,000 years ago at the transition from the 
Middle Stone Age to the Later Stone Age

3

.  In 

this view, behavioural change lagged consider-
ably behind anatomical change, and may have 
resulted from a sudden neurological shift. A 
competing interpretation is that beads, art 
objects and other forms of technological and 
behavioural complexity emerged gradually 
over the course of the Middle Stone Age (some 
285,000 to 45,000 years ago), tracking morpho-
logical evolution more closely

4

.  In this view, 

early H. sapiens were essentially neurologically 
and cognitively identical to modern humans, 
and new behaviours seen in the archaeological 
record resulted from human innovation, some-
times in response to the pressures of popula-
tion growth or environmental change. 

The ability to manipulate symbols is 

Figure 1 

|

 A home at Pinnacle Point. 

Marean and colleagues’ evidence

1

 for modern behaviour in early humans, dating to 165,000 years ago, comes from 

site PP13B, the cave with the walkway entering it. Many coastal archaeology sites elsewhere must have been swept clean by sea-level rises during 
interglacials. The materials at Pinnacle Point were spared such a fate because of the site’s elevation. 

C. W

. MAREAN

793

Vol 449|18 October 2007

NEWS & VIEWS

18 10 N&V CS IF   793

12/10/07   4:44:21 pm

background image

Microliths

Twin Rivers

Twin Rivers

Blombos

Blombos

Taforalt

Skhul

Klasies

Klasies

Grotta dei
Moscerini

Howiesonspoort

Enkapune 
Ya Muto

Enkapune 
Ya Muto

Pinnacle Point

Pinnacle Point

Pinnacle Point

Kapthurin

Shellfishing

Ochre

Shell beads

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Thousands of years ago

Mumba

con sidered an essential part of modern 
human cognition and behaviour

5

, although 

definite traces of symbols in the archaeological 
record are difficult to recognize and are often 
obscured by the ravages of time. All humans 
today express their social status and group 
identity through visual clues such as cloth-
ing, jewellery, cosmetics and hairstyle. Shell 
beads, and haematite used as pigment, show 
that this behaviour dates to 80,000 years ago 
in coastal North and South Africa

6,7

,

 

 and to 

perhaps 110,000 years ago in western Asia

8

; and 

there are even earlier records of microliths and 
pigment use in Africa (Fig. 2). 

Marean et al.

1

 now describe 57 pieces of 

haematite, many apparently ground for use as 
a colouring agent, from cave PP13B at Pinna-
cle Point. Like haematite from the nearby site 
of Blombos, South Africa

6

, some of the pieces 

of haematite from Pinnacle Point are incised, 
either as an aid to grinding, or perhaps as 
decoration, or even as elements of a notational 
system. The Pinnacle Point evidence is signifi-
cant because it suggests that early humans in 
Africa inhabited a cognitive world enriched by 
symbols before 160,000 years ago.   

Might the haematite have been used instead 

for some utilitarian purpose?  Experimental 
replication demonstrates that ochre has little 
of its claimed utility as a hide preservative

9

Archaeological and ethnographic evidence 
shows, however, that ground haematite was 
added to adhesives used to attach stone arte-
facts to bone or wooden shafts, and experi-
mental replication demonstrates that ochre 
improves the durability and workability of 
the mastic

10

. But the consistent selection of 

the most brilliant reds for use in the adhesive 
medium by the inhabitants of Pinnacle Point, 
and of other African sites dating to the Mid-
dle Stone Age

1,9

,

 

cannot be so easily explained. 

Ochre seems to have been a material with both 
symbolic and utilitarian functions. The colour 
red is fundamental to colour classifications 
in all known human societies

11

, and it seems 

probable that the substance was indeed used 
for body painting and to colour artefacts by 
165,000 years ago.   

The presence of stone bladelets at Pinnacle 

Point may also be significant. Miniature stone 
tools were important to African technology 
after 40,000 years ago, when small geometric 
implements were mounted, often in multiples, 
as projectiles. These no doubt gave their wield-
ers an advantage over populations limited to 
hand weapons. Microlithic technology is 
known from South and East Africa at around 
70,000 years ago, but the Pinnacle Point blade-
lets are nearly 100,000 years older. However, 
they show no sign of shaping into geometric 
tools, and the fact that they comprise the small 
end of a continuous size distribution for blades 
at the site indicates that they may not have been 
deliberately designed

12

.  Microwear and residue 

analysis might reveal if and how the bladelets 
were hafted and used.  

At about 165,000 years old, the remains 

of molluscs at Pinnacle Point are the earliest 
securely dated evidence for the systematic 
exploitation of shellfish as food. Marean et al.

1

 

suggest that shellfish may have been seen by 
the Pinnacle Point people as a ‘famine food’, to 
be consumed when more preferred items were 
scarce during the challenging cold and dry con-
ditions that pertained in Africa between about 
195,000 and 130,000 years ago. Neanderthals 
are known to have cooked shellfish in caves in 
Italy as early as 110,000 years ago

13

, and shell-

fish may well have been exploited routinely 
by even earlier coastal populations. However, 
many cave repositories around the world were 
swept clean by the rise in sea level during the 
last interglacial, which ended around 115,000 
years ago, and others have been submerged by 
the sea-level rise of the present interglacial. 

Anthropogenic deposits fortunately escaped 

this fate at Pinnacle Point owing to its eleva-
tion. By comparing dates obtained from ura-
nium-isotope and luminescence dating with 
bathymetric records and reconstruction of 
topography based on geographic-information-
system data, the authors show that the coastline 
lay within reasonable foraging distance of the 
site only at around 167,000 years ago, in good 
agreement with the key dated phase of human 
occupation. Better understanding of the ancient 
topography may help in discovering other sites 
in the vicinity of Pinnacle Point, and advances 
in dating techniques may allow further 
evidence from this critical interval to be 
identified elsewhere on the continent, in both 

coastal and inland settings. We should expect 
surprises as the evidence for behavioural 
complexity in early humans continues to 
accumulate. 

Sally McBrearty is in the Department of 
Anthropology, University of Connecticut, 
Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2176, USA. 
Chris Stringer is in the Department of 
Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, 
London SW7 5BD, UK. 
e-mails: mcbrearty@uconn.edu; 
c.stringer@nhm.ac.uk 

1.   Marean, C. W. et al. Nature 

449, 905–908 (2007). 

2.  Stringer, C. in The Prehistory of Africa (ed. Soodyall, H.) 

10–20 (Ball, Johannesburg, 2006). 

3.  Klein, R. G. & Edgar, B. The Dawn of Human Culture  

(Nevraumont, New York, 2002).

4.  McBrearty, S. & Brooks, A. J. Hum. Evol.  

39, 453–563 

(2000).

5.  Henshilwood, C. S. & Marean, C. W. Curr. Anthropol. 

44, 

641–642 (2003).

6.  Henshilwood, C. S. in Rethinking the Human Revolution 

(eds Mellars, P. & Boyle, K.) (MacDonald Institute, 
Cambridge, in the press). 

7. Bouzouggar, 

A. 

et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 

104, 

9964–9969 (2007).

8. Vanhaeren, 

M. 

et al. Science 

312, 1785–1788 

(2006). 

9. Watts, 

I. 

S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. 

57, 1–14 (2002).

10.  Wadley, L., Williamson, B. & Lombard, M. Antiquity 

78, 

661–675 (2004). 

11.  Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, M. & Merrifield, W. in Color 

Categories in Thought and Language (eds Hardin, C. & 
Maffi, I.) 21–58 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997). 

12.  Ambrose, S. H. in Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on 

Microlithization (eds Elston, R. G. & Kuhn, S. H.) 9–29 
(Am. Anthropol. Assoc., Washington DC, 2002). 

13.  Stiner, M. C. Honor Among Thieves (Princeton Univ. Press, 

1994). 

Figure 2 

|

 Timeline of some notable archaeological evidence for modern behaviour in early Homo 

sapiens

For context, the earliest unequivocal fossils of H. sapiens come from two sites in Ethiopia, 

and date to about 195,000 and 160,000 years ago. The behavioural evidence is in the form of the 
production of microliths (very small stone flakes); the exploitation of shellfish as a food resource; 
the use of ochre (haematite) as a pigment; and the creation of shell beads. The coastal site of 
Pinnacle Point, South Africa, has yielded evidence for the first three of these activities, as described by 
Marean et al.

1

. Site locations: Twin Rivers, Zambia; Howiesonspoort, South Africa; Mumba, Tanzania; 

Enkapune Ya Muto, Kenya; Klasies, South Africa; Kapthurin, Kenya; Blombos, South Africa; Skhul, 
Israel; and Taforalt, Morocco. Grotta dei Moscerini, in Italy, provides an early example of Neanderthal 
exploitation of marine resources.

794

NATURE|Vol 449|18 October 2007

NEWS & VIEWS

18 10 N&V CS IF   794

12/10/07   4:44:28 pm