background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

REUSE OF SINGLE USE 

REUSE OF SINGLE USE 

DEVICES

DEVICES

Christina Bradley

Laboratory Manager

Hospital Infection Research Laboratory

City Hospital, Birmingham

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

INTERNATIONAL OPINION

INTERNATIONAL OPINION

Most national authorities, particularly in 
wealthier countries, are against reuse in 
principle but may accept reuse provided 
strict reprocessing criteria are met

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

MEDICAL DEVICES

z

In the European Union, the use of 
medical devices is regulated by 
European or national law

z

Medical Devices Directive (1993)

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK GUIDANCE

UK GUIDANCE

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

A medical device made for reuse must 
work as well as it did on its first use 
every time that is is reprocessed.  The 
manufacturer will validate the device for 
reuse and provide adequate 
reprocessing instructions when the 
device is placed on the market.

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

A single use device may be made in 
such a way that any reprocessing may 
damage it or alter it to the extent of 
making it unsafe to reuse.  If the device 
has been designed for single use, the 
manufacturer need not undertake any 
reprocessing validation studies and is 
therefore not required to provide such 
information.

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2006(04)

UK : DB 2006(04)

z

Safety Issues

– Reprocessing single use devices may 

compromise its intended function.

– Single use devices may not be designed to allow 

thorough decontamination.

– Reprocessing a single use device may alter its 

characteristics so that it no longer complies with 
the original manufacturers specifications and 
therefore the performance may be compromised.

– Single use devices have not undergone extensive 

testing, validation and documentation to ensure 
the device is safe to reuse

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Potential for cross infection

– Greatest concern

– Risk may increase due to inability to 

access all micro-organisms

– May be due to design eg narrow lumens 

and materials

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Inability to clean and decontaminate

– Access to all surfaces eg acute angles, 

coils, long or narrow lumens, specialist 
surface coatings

– Validation of complete removal of all micro-

organisms

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Residues for chemical decontamination 
agents

– Materials may absorb or adsorb certain 

chemicals eg glutaraldehyde, ethylene 
oxide

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Material alteration

– Exposure to chemicals may cause 

corrosion and/or changes in the device 
materials

– Exposure to elevated temperatures may 

alter the properties or cause degradation of 
the device materials eg plastics may 
soften, crack or become brittle

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Mechanical failure

– Devices may experience stress during 

each cycle of reuse leading to fatigue 
induced failure and fracturing eg single use 
drill burrs, saw baldes, craniotomy knives

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Reaction to endotoxins

– Breakdown products of gram negative 

bacteria

– May remain on instruments after cleaning

– Sterilization process will not inactivate 

endotoxins

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

UK : DB 2004(04)

z

Prion disease

– Health Service Circular 1999/178 states 

that “devices designated for single 
episodes of use must not be reused under 
any circumstances whatsoever”

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

REUSE : OBJECTIVE

REUSE : OBJECTIVE

SAFETY

versus

COST

Reduce spending on non cost effective 
single use items releasing more funds for 
patient care, expensive reusable devices 
and reducing the amount of clinical waste

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CSC SURVEY 1996

CSC SURVEY 1996

79 replies received

54% acknowledged they were 
reprocessing items labeled as single use

56 single use items were identified as 
reused

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CSC SURVEY (1996) : ITEMS 

CSC SURVEY (1996) : ITEMS 

REUSED

REUSED

z

Cardiac catheters

z

Pacemakers

z

Pacemaker 
electrodes

z

Guide wires

z

Eye shields

z

Oxygen masks

z

Airways

z

Suction 
tubing/catheters

z

Anaesthetic tubing

z

Tracheostomy tubes

z

Endotracheal tubes

z

Foetal scalp 
electrodes

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

REUSE OF MEDICAL DEVICES

REUSE OF MEDICAL DEVICES

If a medical device is reused and causes 
damage or injury, the re-processor and 
the re-user are likely to be become 
personally liable (civil and criminal 
liability)

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

RISK ASSESSMENT

RISK ASSESSMENT

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

DEVICE ASSESSMENT GROUP

DEVICE ASSESSMENT GROUP

z

Infection Control Doctor

z

Infection Control Nurse

z

Procurement Officer

z

Member of the Ethical Committee

z

Processor(s)

z

Risk Management Officer (or equivalent)

z

User

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED

FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED

z

Single use “reuse” category

z

Infection risk

z

Method of reprocessing

z

Cost

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

SINGLE USE 

SINGLE USE 

REUSE

REUSE

CATEGORIES

CATEGORIES

z

Unused items requiring sterilization 
following damage to pack or opening in 
error eg pacemaker

z

Items used for more than one procedure 
on the same patient eg insulin syringes

z

Items used on more than one patient 
after reprocessing

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

REUSE OF SINGLE USE ITEMS

REUSE OF SINGLE USE ITEMS

INFECTION RISK (1)

INFECTION RISK (1)

High

In contact with a break in the skin 
or mucous membrane

Class 1

Very high risk – Intravascular, 
intraventricular, intraoptic devices
Difficult to clean, heat labile, 
sterilization necessary.  Infections 
may be severe and difficult to treat 
eg endocarditis, meningitis

Class 2

Usually cleanable, heat tolerant, 
sterilization necessary eg surgical 
instruments

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

REUSE OF SINGLE USE ITEMS

REUSE OF SINGLE USE ITEMS

INFECTION RISK (2)

INFECTION RISK (2)

Intermediate
In contact with intact mucous membranes, 
usually cleanable, disinfection is usually 
adequate

Low
In contact with intact skin, usually cleanable, 
disinfection (or often cleaning alone) is 
adequate

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (1)

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (1)

z

Can it be cleaned?

z

Can it be adequately decontaminated ie
cleaned/disinfected/sterilized with 
respect to the infection risk it poses to 
the patient?

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (2)

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (2)

z

Is the item structurally or functionally 
damaged during reprocessing due to 
pressure, high temperature or 
chemicals?

z

Are harmful residues present after 
processing?

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (3)

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (3)

z

Is the reprocessor put at any additional 
or significant risk whilst processing (or 
disposing of) the item eg exposure to 
infectious material, hazardous 
chemicals or sharps?

z

Are suitable processing equipment, 
facilities and expertise available?

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

CAN THE ITEM BE SUITABLY 

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (4)

REPROCESSED AND REUSED (4)

z

Is it possible to assess if the item is 
suitable for reuse by visual inspection or 
testing?

z

If so can the number of reuses be 
identified by tagging or bar coding?

z

Is sterility important?  Can this be 
ensured by wrapping or processing at 
point of use?

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

REUSE OF SINGLE USE ITEMS

REUSE OF SINGLE USE ITEMS

RISKS OTHER THAN INFECTION

RISKS OTHER THAN INFECTION

z

Intravascular devices

– Breakage in situ

– Harm from release of toxic agents eg

ethylene oxide, endotoxins

z

Respiratory equipment

– Harm from release of toxic agents eg

ethylene oxide, endotoxins

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

IS REPROCESSING COST 

IS REPROCESSING COST 

EFFECTIVE (1)

EFFECTIVE (1)

z

Initial cost of the item

z

Processing costs including labour

– Transport – to and from the processor
– Cleaning
– Disinfection/sterilization
– Packaging
– Documentation
– Testing/validation

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

IS REPROCESSING COST 

IS REPROCESSING COST 

EFFECTIVE (2)

EFFECTIVE (2)

z

Recording/tracking

z

Additional equipment (if required)

z

Training of processing staff

z

Additional safety measures

– Personal protective equipment
– Exhaust systems
– Health checks
– Monitoring devices

z

Disposal of single use item as single use

background image

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

HIRL Birmingham

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

z

The legal consequences should be 

considered.

z

Reprocessing will depend on careful costing 

taking into account all the variables.

z

Reprocessing should be validated

z

Advice should be sought from a Device 

Management Group and a risk assessment 
carried out.