background image

 

 

Investment in ICT and international 

competitiveness

Marcin Gomułka

World Economy Research Institute

background image

 

 

The economic approach 

vs

The business approach

background image

 

 

What is competitiveness?

Paul Krugman (1994): 

the most popular definition of competitiveness 
nowadays runs along the lines of the one given in 
Council of Economic Advisors Chairman Laura 
D'Andrea Tyson ... : 

competitiveness is "our ability to produce 
goods and services that meet the test of 
international competition while our citizens 
enjoy a standard of living that is both rising 
and sustainable."

background image

 

 

Krugman says, it's simpler:

So in an economy with very little international trade, 

the growth in living standards -- and thus 

"competitiveness"...  -- would be determined almost 

entirely by domestic factors, primarily the rate of 

productivity growth. 

That's domestic productivity growth, period -- not 

productivity growth relative to other countries. 

In other words, for an economy with very little 

international trade, "competitiveness" would turn out 

to be a funny way of saying "productivity" and would 

have nothing to do with international competition.

background image

 

 

Business reasons to invest in ICT

Nr

Type of investment

Comment

Profitability

1

Infrastructural

LAN network. Base for further 
investment.

Low

2

Required/forced

Regulations or business partner

None. Cost of doing 
business

3

Only way to do the 
job

Flight ticket reservation

Has potential

4

Direct profitability

Can be calculated upfont

Low

5

Intermediate 
profitability 

Reservation systems for travel 
agencies

High potential

6

Necessary to compete Automatic teller machines. EDI, e-

commerce.  

Low for followers

7

Strategic

Company strategy relies on it

High potential

8

Transformative

Virtual corporations.  Necessary 
change in philosophy and 
organisation. 

High potential

Source: Lucas (1999)

background image

 

 

Reason 3: Only way to do the job 

Consider that ca. 50% of US economy 

is now information processing

ICT are the machines for that job

background image

 

 

1800

1820

1840

1860

1880

1900

1920

1940

1960

1980

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Agriculture

Industrial

Service

Information

 Information processing is the dominant part 

of the US economy. 

(% of employment)

Source: http://www.cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/reviews/beniger/beniger-table.html

background image

 

 

Enabler: falling prices of ICT 

equipment

Source: Brynjolfsson, Yang (1996)

background image

 

 

Moore's Law – the progress in the 

production of capital goods 

Source: Brynjolfsson, Yang (1996)

background image

 

 

The consequence is that it is possible to 

get more information processing power 

for the same money

We do spend more on ICT. We also get 

more.

background image

 

 

Nominal and real share of 

investment

Investment jump
ca.1978-1984

Source: Brynjolfsson, Yang (1996)

background image

 

 

Acceleration of growth in the 

late1990s – caused by IT?

Source: Triplett, Bosworth 2003

background image

 

 

This is a big economic issue

There were 3 phases in the growth of 

the US economy

1. After WW2 growth 1945-1973

2. Productivity growth slowdown 1973-

1995

3. Faster growth since 1995

background image

 

 

Investment surge in the late 1990s

Source: McKinsey (2001)

background image

 

 

Is ICT as a „General Purpose 

Technology”?

 Lipsey et al. (1998) :
"a technology that initially has much scope for 
improvement and eventually comes to be 
widely used, to have many uses
, and to have 
many Hicksian and technological 
complementarities" -
Examples: 
- steam
- electricity

background image

 

 

Some industries benefit from IT 

investment, many do not. 

Source: McKinsey (2001)

background image

 

 

Finance in the EU enabled by ICT in 1984

LP_I

E

M

P

/E

M

P

_T

O

T

0.

02

0

0.

02

5

0.

03

0

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

J

EU15ex

EUROex

LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY

S

H

A

R

E

 O

F

 T

O

TA

L

 E

M

P

L

O

Y

M

E

N

T

st

ag

na

tin

pr

od

uc

tiv

ity

Enabled productivity growth

1984

background image

 

 

ICT capital goods productivity has 

grown

Software goods production has not

Consequences for international 

competitiveness

background image

 

 

Productivity of software coding

(programming tasks per month)

background image

 

 

Source: IMF 2001

Change 
in prices 
of IT 
goods

background image

 

 

These 

activities can 

get offshored

background image

 

 

background image

 

 

background image

 

 

Conclusions

It's better to look at productivity than 

competitiveness

ICT investment enabled growth after 1995

Software is now a real competitiveness issue 

(who is producing what)

background image

 

 

background image

 

 

Some simple productivity 

issues

background image

 

 

QA A=

Q

L

1. quantities

pQ=wL

value identity

pQ

Q

=

w L

A

A=

w

p

2. prices

Two approaches to productivity

background image

 

 

Two sectors and purchasing power

farmers buying apples

w

1

p

1

farmers buying houses

w

1

p

2

builders buying apples

w

2

p

1

builders buying houses

w

2

p

2

background image

 

 

Competitiveness = 

Productivity plus pricing power

nominal wage=w

1

=

p

1

Q

L

=

p

1

A

real wage=

w

1

p

*

=

p

1

p

*

A

background image

 

 

QUICK INTRODUCTION INTO 

GROWTH ACCOUNTING

HOW CAN WE EXPLAIN GROWTH?

background image

 

 

How to get higher output?

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

LABOUR

CAPITAL

TECHNOLOGY 
PROGRESS

background image

 

 

Some multipliers

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

LABOUR

CAPITAL

TECHNOLOGY 
PROGRESS

m

L

m

K

1

background image

 

 

Put this all in an equation. 

Consider growth rates.

OUTPUT
GROWTH

=CAPITAL

GROWTH

m

K

LABOUR

GROWTH

m

L

TECH

GROWTH

5 % =2 %⋅0.30

capital impact

2 %⋅0.70

labour impact

3 %

residual

Example:

background image

 

 


Document Outline