background image

METHANOL TO GASOLINE 

(MTG) TECHNOLOGY

An Alternative for Liquid 
Fuel Production 

Mitch Hindman 

ExxonMobil Research & Engineering (EMRE)

World CTL Conference

background image

AGENDA

• Coal/Biomass to Liquid Fuels Background

• EMRE Methanol to Gasoline Technology

• MTG and Fischer-Tropsch Comparative Analysis

• EMRE MTG Licensing – The MTG Advantage

2

background image

Coal/Biomass  TO 

LIQUID FUELS 

BACKGROUND

background image

OPTIONS FOR COAL LIQUEFACTION

Direct

Liquefaction

Fischer-

Tropsch 

Synthesis

Coal / 

Biomass 

Methanol

Synthesis

“Synthetic

Crude”

CH

3

OH

“F-T Crude”

CO

2

O

2

H

2

O

Coal Gasification

Syngas: H

2

CO

2

O

2

Coal Gasification

Syngas: CO + 2H

2

H

2

O

H

2

Direct

Indirect

4

background image

OPTIONS FOR COAL TO LIQUID FUELS

H

2

Direct

Liquefaction

Fischer-

Tropsch 

Synthesis

Gasification

Gasification

Coal / 

Biomass

MeOH

Synthesis

Refining

Gasification

MTG

Refining

Liquid

Fuels

5

background image

EMRE METHANOL 

TO GASOLINE 

TECHNOLOGY

background image

• MTG reactions de-hydrate methanol and 

convert the available carbon and hydrogen 
into various hydrocarbons 

• The “Shape Selective” MTG catalyst limits 

the synthesis reactions to 10  carbons 

• The result is sulfur free gasoline with a 

typical 92 Research Octane 

• The first MTG plant was operated in New 

Zealand from 1985 to 1997 converting 
natural gas to gasoline

EXXONMOBIL MTG TECHNOLOGY

Methanol

Water

Gasoline

7

background image

MTG REACTION PATH

8

2 CH

3

OH

CH

3

OCH

3

+   H

2

0

CH

3

OH, CH3OCH3 

Light Olefins

+ H

2

0

Light Olefins

C

5

+  Olefins 

Paraffins 
Naphthenes
Aromatics

C

5

+  Olefins 

Methanol

Di-Methyl Ether

Methanol,

Gasoline

Di-Methyl Ether

background image

MTG YIELDS AND PROPERTIES/COMPOSITION 

9

MTG GASOLINE YIELDS

Percent of 

Feed

Percent of 

Hydrocarbon 

Product 

Gas

1%

2%

LPG

5%

11%

Gasoline

38%

87%

H

2

O

56%

-

MTG GASOLINE  

PROPERTIES/COMPOSITION

Octane, RON

92

Octane, MON

82

(R+M)/2

87

Paraffins, vol%

53

Olefins, vol%

12

Naphthenes, vol%

9

Aromatics, vol%

26

Benzene, vol%

0.3

Sulfur 

nil

background image

• Methanol is fed to a fixed bed reactor system where all of the 

methanol is converted to hydrocarbon and water

• MTG reactor effluent is separated into gas, raw gasoline and water

• Raw gasoline is separated into LPG, light gasoline & heavy gasoline

• Heavy gasoline is hydro-treated to reduce durene content 

• Heavy and light gasoline are re-combined into finished MTG gasoline

EMRE MTG PROCESS

10

background image

EMRE MTG PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

LPG

Light 

Gasoline

Treated 

Gasoline

Heavy 

Gasoline

MTG 

Reactor 

System 

(Multiple)

C2-

Stabilized 

Gasoline

LPG

DeEthanizer

Stabilizer

Stabilizer

Splitter

HGT 

Reactor

Methanol

Purge Gas

Raw

Gasoline

Finished

Gasoline

Blending

H

2

O

11

background image

NEW ZEALAND MTG FACILITY: NEW PLYMOUTH NZ

14,500 BPD plant in New Plymouth New Zealand. 

Plant ownership 75% NZ Government and 25% ExxonMobi

l

.

MTG

MTG

SynGas and 

SynGas and 

MeOH Generation

MeOH Generation

12

background image

• The New Zealand MTG experience demonstrated MTG to be a robust technology

• Daily gasoline yield and octane indicated a very consistent process  performance 

• After start up the  unit ran reliably with an on-stream factor greater than 96% 

NEW ZEALAND PLANT OPERATING EXPERIENCE

Initial Startup:  October, 1985

> 96% Stream Factor over 7 year period

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

0

360

720 1080 1440 1800 2160 2520 2880

Elapsed Time, Days

Rx Stream Factor

GASOLINE OCTANE, RON

90

92

94

96

1st Calendar Year

85

90

95

GASOLINE YIELD

WT% OF HC

1st 

Calendar

Year

13

background image

• Operability

– Gas phase conventional fixed bed reactors

– On-stream MTG catalyst regeneration and replacement

– Gasoline production is de-coupled from syngas generation and methanol 

synthesis -- Improves on-stream factor vs. direct coupled operation

KEY MTG FEATURES

14

background image

• Second Generation Design based on 10 years

learning's from New Zealand operation

• Improved heat integration 

• Improved process efficiency

2

ND

GENERATION MTG TECHNOLOGY

Ongoing 2

nd

Generation 

MTG Catalyst Research 

ExxonMobil is the world  leader In 

catalyst development and manufacture 

15

background image

World’s First Coal to Liquids Plant using MTG

16

• First 2

nd

generation MTG: JAMG plant in Shanxi 

Province China 

• Start Up; June 2009, 2,500 B/D gasoline 

MTG Unit

background image

• DKRW announced in Dec. 2007 the first U.S. CTL plant to utilize MTG in 

their 15 KBD Medicine Bow, WY Project

• Synthesis Energy Systems in September, 2008 announced their license for 

MTG Technology for a series of global CTL projects

OTHER MTG LICENSES

17

background image

MTG AND FISCHER‐TROPSCH 

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

background image

FISCHER-TROPSCH

MTG

F-T & MTG COMPARATIVE STOICHIOMETRY

(

CO + 2H

2

)  

Π(

-C

1

H

2

-)

+ H

2

O

SYN GAS

Gas &

F-T Liquids

(

CO + 2H

2

)  

ΠCH

3

OH 

Π(

-C

1

H

2

-)

+ H

2

SYN GAS

METHANOL

Gas &

MTG Gasoline

19

background image

• F-T yields depend on catalyst, temperature and specific technology
• F-T processes produce a range of hydrocarbons that require refining 

processes to convert F-T liquids to conventional fuels

• MTG produces a conventional gasoline and an LPG stream 

F-T & MTG COMPONENT YIELDS

Components

Fischer‐Tropsch 

Co Catalyst @ 220 C

Fischer‐Tropsch 

Fe Catalyst @ 340 C

MTG

Fuel Gas

6

15

1.1

LPG

6

23

10.0

Naphtha

19

36

GASOLINE

88.8

Distillate/Diesel

22

16

Fuel Oil/Wax

46

5

Oxygenates

1

5

Data Sources: Sasol 2004 publication. 

20

background image

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2010

2015

2030

MB

/D

Pet. Gasoline

Pet. Diesel

Despite demand shifts to diesel and 
ethanol substitution, U.S. projected 
to remain heavily dependent on 
petroleum gasoline.                                            

(Source: U.S. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2010))

Based on energy content, U.S. & 
Europe prices have consistently 
provided gasoline a premium over 
diesel

(Source: U.S. EIA, 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-

more-prices.cfm

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/prices.html#

Gasoline @ 5.25 MBTU/BBL,  Diesel @ 5.83 MBTU/BBL: Transportation 
Energy Data Book)

U.S. PETROLEUM FUEL DEMAND

Gasoline - Diesel Price ($/MBTU)

Gasoline vs. Diesel as Synthesis Product 

(3.5)

(3.0)

(2.5)

(2.0)

(1.5)

(1.0)

(0.5)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

$/

M

B

T

U

FRANCE

Germany

U.S.

background image

• Joint Study by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and 

National Academy of Engineering as part of the America 
Energy Future Project

• Study included a comparative analysis of MTG and Fischer-

Tropsch as alternatives for coal/biomass to liquid fuels

– 50,000 bpd of transportation fuel; i.e. gasoline (no naphtha) and/or diesel

– Light fractions recycled for conversion or electric power

– Study considered impact of Carbon Capture and Sequestration 

2009 STUDY:LIQUID TRANSPORTATION FUELS FROM 
COAL / BIOMASS*

*Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal / Biomass: Technological Status, Costs and Environmental Impact,              
ISBN: 0-309-13713-6, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12620.html

22

background image

• The study indicated the MTG based plant had slightly higher overall efficiency 

and lower construction costs 

• CO

2

Sequestration lowered efficiency by about 1.5% and raised costs 1.5-2%

Fischer-Tropsch 

No CO

2

Capture

Fischer-Tropsch 

With CO

2

Capture

MTG

No CO

Capture

MTG 

With

CO

2

Capture

INPUT

Coal, tpd (as received)

26,700

26,700

22,900

23,200

OUTPUTS

Diesel, bpd

28,700

28,700

Gasoline, bpd

21,290

21,290

50,000

50,000

Total Liquid Fuel, bpd

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

Electricity, MW 

e

427

317

145

111

THERMAL EFF. (LHV)

49.1%

47.6%

54.2%

52.9%

TOTAL PLANT COST ($M)

4,880

4,950

3,940

4,020

TOTAL PLANT COST ($K/bpd)

97.6

98.9

78.8

80.4

EST. BREAKEVEN CRUDE PRICE ($/BBL)

56

68

47

51

2009 NRC STUDY:
LIQUID TRANSPORTATION FUELS FROM COAL / BIOMASS

F-T & MTG ECONOMIC 
COMPARISON

Data Sources: Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass, © National Academy of Sciences, 2009; http//www.nap.edu/catalog/12620.html 

23

background image

MTG 

Licensing

background image

EMRE/Uhde Partnership Provides Full Range of Project 

Services

Gasification

Gasoline

MTG

Methanol

Coal/Biomass

EMRE Licenses Methanol to Gasoline 
Technology

EMRE provides basic engineering 
design package for licensees to 
perform detailed engineering design 
and construction.

EMRE provides catalysts for the
MTG process.

EMRE provides assistance for MTG 
start-up and troubleshooting
.

Uhde provides feasibility studies for the 
entire process of  clean gasoline 
production from coal. 

Uhde Licenses PRENFLO Gasification 
technology 

Uhde can support other CTL/BTL 
technologies to meet customer’s 
specific needs

Uhde can provide a range of 
engineering, procurement and 
construction services