background image

How do Jehovah's Witnesses' teachings about Christ compare with 

Scriptures?

 

 
 

 

 

 

M

any people are confused about 

the Jehovah's Witnesses. People 
have written to ask if they are 
Christians or do they worship a 
different God? The following article 
may help to answer this important 
questions.  

Jehovah's Witnesses and 
Christians have several things in 
common. They share common 
concerns about religious apostasy, 
they teach against evolution and 
they believe that Christ will return to destroy the forces of Satan and 
establish His kingdom on earth.  

Jehovah's Witnesses and Christians do, however, differ on many 
important doctrines. In an attempt to keep this article to a reasonable 
length, let us not concentrate on ALL the differences. Rather...  

...L

ET US INVESTIGATE THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE, THE 

PERSON OF JESUS CHRIST. 

 
JW's believe that Jesus Christ was a perfect man, and that He is a 
person distinct from God the Father. However, they also teach that 
before His earthly life, Jesus was a spirit creature, Michael the 

archangel

, who was created by God and became the Messiah at His 

baptism. According to Jehovah's Witnesses, Jesus is a mighty one, 
although not almighty as Jehovah God is. According to 

John 1:1

 in their 

Bible, The New World Translation, Christ is "a god" but not "the God." 
They teach that Jesus "was and is and always will be beneath 
Jehovah" and that "Christ and God are not coequal".  

Does the Bible confirm their beliefs or does it teach the orthodox 
Christian concept that Christ is God? This is an extremely important 
question. Consider the following points:  

1.  The Christ of the New Testament is the Jehovah of the Old 

Testament. 

o

 

Isaiah wrote about seeing Jehovah in 

Isaiah 6:1-10

background image

o

 

In 

John 12:31-42

, we are told that Isaiah saw Jesus' glory 

and spoke of Him 

o

 

In 

Exodus 34:14

 we are to worship no one but Jehovah. 

o

 

In 

Hebrews 1:6

 the angels worship Christ. 

o

 

In 

Isaiah 44:6

 Jehovah is called the first and the last 

(confirmed in 

Revelation 1:8

), 

o

 

but in 

Revelation 22:13

 Christ is the first and the last.  

These verses demonstrate that the name "Jehovah" is used for 
both God the Father and of God the Son. Although they are 
distinct persons they are each called "Jehovah" because they 
each possess deity.  

2.  The deity of Christ is taught in Scripture. 

In 

Matthew 1:23

, Christ is called "Immanuel," which means "God 

with us." 
When Thomas touched Jesus' wounds, after the resurrection, he 
exclaimed, "My Lord and my God" (

John 20:28

). There is no 

basis whatsoever for saying, as some JW's say, that Thomas 
was referring to Christ when he said "my Lord" but was referring 
to God (Jehovah) when he said "my God." Instead, Thomas 
called Christ both his Lord and his God. And Christ did not 
correct him! 

Colossians 2:9

 clearly confirms the deity of Christ 

when it states that in Him "all the fullness of the divine quality 
dwells bodily" (New World Translation). Stephen called Jesus 
"Lord" (

Acts 7:59,60

), and we are to confess Jesus as Lord 

(

Rom. 10:9

I Cor. 12:3

). "Lord" in these verses is Kurios, which 

is the Greek word for Jehovah in the Septuagint, the Greek 
version of the Old Testament. It is evident from this that Christ 
the Lord (kurios) is Jehovah God.  

3.  Attributes of Christ show that He is God. 

Jesus Christ knows all things (John 

1:48

2:25

6:64

14:30

21:17

). He is all-powerful (

Matt. 28:18

Heb. 1:3

), sinless (

John 

8:46

), eternal (

Mic. 5:2

), and unchanging (

Heb. 13:8

). Since only 

God possesses these attributes, Christ must be God.  

4.  Certain works of Christ show that He is God. 

Jesus Christ has the power to forgive sins (

Mark 2:5-7

Eph. 

1:7

), give eternal life (John 

10:28

17:2

), judge the world (

John 

5:22, 27

), and control nature (

Matt. 8:26

). Since only God can do 

these things, Christ must be God.  

5.  Christ received worship as God. 

Jesus is worshipped by the angels (

Heb. 1:6

) and by man (

Matt. 

14:33

), and yet only God is to be worshipped (

Ex. 34:14

). Christ 

Himself said that worship is due to God alone (

Matt. 4:10

), and 

yet He accepted worship. If Jesus in His pre-existent state were 
the 

archangel

 Michael, how could He have received worship, 

background image

since angels are not allowed to receive worship (Rev. 

19:10

)? If 

Christ were not God, then worshipping Him would be idolatrous. 

6.  Jesus Christ is called "the mighty God" in 

Isaiah 9:6

. 

JW's have a ready answer for this verse. They explain that 
Christ is "the mighty god" but not "the almighty." They say that 
Christ is the mighty, never the almighty and that Jehovah is the 
almighty God, never the mighty. However, 

Jeremiah 32:18

 

shows that Jehovah is the mighty One. Therefore, since Christ is 
the mighty God (

Isaiah 9:6

) and Jehovah is the mighty God (

Jer. 

32:18

), they are both God. They both possess full deity.  

7.  Christ is God, the Creator of all things according to 

Colossians 1:15-17

. 

JW's refer to this passage to support their teaching that Christ 
was created by Jehovah (for example, Let God Be True, p.35). 
This is based primarily on the words, "the firstborn of all 
creation," in verse 15. However, if this verse was teaching that 
Jesus Christ is the first created being made by God, the word 
"first-created" would have been used of Christ, not the word 
"firstborn." These are two different words in the Greek, with two 
different meanings. "First-created" is protoktistos, and "firstborn" 
is prototokos. 

Colossians 1:15

 does not use the protoktistos, 

"first-created." Instead it uses prototokos, which means an heir, 
a begotten one, the first in rank. The teaching of Colossians 
1:15 is that Christ is first in rank above all creation; He is the 
Heir of all things. He is prior to all creation and superior over it.  

The JW's New World Translation adds the word "other" four 
times in 

Colossians 1:15-17

, so that the passage states that 

Christ created "all other things," everything except Himself. 
However, there is no basis for adding "other." It certainly does 
not occur in the Greek manuscripts. The translators of the New 
World Translation admit this by putting "other" in brackets. This 
"translation" attempts to comply with the assumption that 
firstborn means first-created. But, as shown, this is not the 
meaning of firstborn, and therefore it is also wrong to add the 
word "other." There is no verse in the entire Bible that states that 
Christ was created by Jehovah!  

8.  Christ claimed to be equal with God in 

John 10:30

. 

JW's believe that this verse, "I and the Father are one," means 
that Christ was one with God the Father in purpose and not in 
nature and essence. However, if that was all Christ was saying, 
why did the Jews want to stone Him? They themselves thought 
His purpose was the same as God's. 

Verse 33

 of John 10 

explains that they wanted to stone Him because of 

blasphemy

because He claimed to be God!  

background image

The deity of Christ is the central point of the Scriptures. It clearly 
teaches that Christ is God. The teachings of the Jehovah's Witness' 
concerning Jesus Christ clearly contradict the teachings of the Bible. 
Passages such as 

Philippians 2:5-11

 tell us that Jesus Christ, who 

existed as God, took the bodily form of a humble servant so that He 
could die on the cross in our place. "Therefore also God highly exalted 
Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, that 
at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those who are in 
heaven, and on earth, and under the earth, and that every tongue 
should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord (kurios), to the glory of God 
the Father." 

How to Talk Creation with a Jehovah's 
Witness 

by Robert Doolan 

A survey of members of conservative churches in 10 states across 
America found that almost 90 per cent of those polled had met a 
Jehovah's Witness. Yet almost none of these people knew what 
Jehovah's Witnesses believe, or how to talk to them properly. But the 
best place to start is at the beginning—at creation. 

You've got to give credit to Jehovah's Witnesses for one thing. Their zeal and 

persistence is probably unparalleled among religious groups. And even if they do 
always seem to knock on your door when you're either sleeping in, sitting down 

to Sunday dinner, or trying to feed the baby, if you talk to them long enough 

you'll find they are as anti-evolution as you are. Their headquarters in Brooklyn, 

New York, produces millions of copies of books which expose the errors of 
evolution and give evidence for creation.

1

The problem is that the Watchtower society, the Jehovah's Witnesses' 
organization, is notorious for overlooking details that prove their ideas wrong. 

Like many other cults, their zeal is '

not according to knowledge

', as Paul lamented 

of Israel (

Romans 10:2

). Unfortunately, their ideas on creation suffer from this 

malady also. So creationists who talk to them at the door should know where the 

'Watchtower creation' differs from God's creation as revealed in Genesis and 
other parts of the Bible. 

The purpose of this article is not to provoke you to argue with Jehovah's 
Witnesses. Your argument is not with the Witness on your doorstep, but with the 

leaders of his or her organization. They have led the Witness to think that the 

distorted doctrines they have taught him or her are in fact God's truth. Your 

purpose in discussing creation with Jehovah's Witnesses—and you will find you 

background image

have a common interest in this subject—is to urge them to see that their leaders 

are not providing them with reliable information. They rely on the doctrines of 

men who have made Scripture fit their own ideas. If the Witness can see this, he 
or she may be more open to the truths of the Gospel. 

Begin your discussion by admitting that you have a strong interest in creation. 
Say you have heard that the Watchtower society produces a lot of material 

exposing the errors of evolution, for which they are to be commended. Then add 

that you have also heard strong criticism of their doctrines. Ask if you could go 

over a few passages of the Bible with them about creation. They won't refuse. If 
you have difficulty remembering all the points listed below, ask if they would take 

this article away and read it, then let you know their response to each point.  

How long is a Genesis day?  

Start by discussing the length of the days in the first chapter of Genesis. 

The Watchtower publication 'Life—How Did It Get Here?' rightly points out that 
the Hebrew word yom, translated '

day

', can mean different lengths of time.

2

 

Because  yom sometimes allows periods much longer than 24 hours, the 

Watchtower organization has decided that this is what 'day' must mean 

throughout the first chapter of Genesis. 

However, good exegesis requires that a secondary meaning of any Biblical text 

should only be sought if a literal reading doesn't make sense. But the literal 24-

hour day, with evening and morning each day, makes very good sense in the early 
verses of Genesis. In the overwhelming number of its occurrences, the word yom 

means an ordinary, literal day—either an entire solar day, or the daylight part of 

an ordinary solar day. Whenever the word is used in Scripture with specific 

beginning and end points ('

evening

' and '

morning

') or is described as '

the first 

day

', '

the sixth day

', etc., it always refers to a literal solar day.

3

 This should be 

pointed out to the Jehovah's Witness. 

A well-known scholar in New Testament Greek, Dr Robert H. Countess, has 
critically analysed the Jehovah's Witnesses' New Testament. He found that the 

translators of the Jehovah's Witnesses' New World Translation have adopted—as 

well as invented—certain principles whereby they have chosen a reading not 

found in their basic Greek text or in any Greek text.

4

 This tendency seems at 

times to inhibit the Watchtower's literal acceptance of the Old Testament text as 

well. 

In most translations 

John 1:1

 shows that Jesus the Creator ('

the Word

') '

was God

'. 

But the New World translation has added to Scripture by saying 'the Word was a 

god', making Jesus to be a false god like Baal or Satan. 

Ask the Jehovah's Witness this: 'If the writer of Genesis wanted to describe the 

six days of creation as six ordinary 24-hour days, how should he have done it?' 

background image

Each day in Genesis 1 has an evening and a morning, and is described as the 'first 

day', the 'second day', etc. Ask the Jehovah's Witness how it could have been 

made clearer. 

The Watchtower organization teaches that 

Genesis 1:3-31

 is not discussing the 

original creation of matter of the heavenly bodies. It describes the preparation of 
the already existing earth for human habitation. "Therefore the Watchtower 

society allows the possibility of millions of years before verse 3.

6

 But they seem to 

ignore the main verse that refutes this. In 

Exodus 20:11

, God Himself wrote on 

tablets of stone, '

In six days, the Lord made heaven and earth

 [

Genesis 1 :1

], 

the 

sea, and all that in them is

 [Genesis 1:2 onwards].' There is no room in any of 

these verses for millions of years, or even any years. 

God's six days of work and one day of rest are given as a reason why we should 
have a day of rest following six days of labour. We do not work thousands of years 

then have thousands of years of rest. There is no break in the creation between 

verses 1, 2 and 3 as the Watchtower society implies. In any case, as linguist Dr 

Charles Taylor pointed out in reply to a Jehovah's Witnesses' claim that each 'day' 
is thousands of years long: 'there's no sense having a 1,000-year wait between the 

creation of the plants and the creation of the insects to fertilize them.'

7

Is the Holy Spirit God's 'Active Force'?  

In any discussion with a Jehovah's Witness on the subject of creation, you are 

sure to come up against their conception of the Holy Spirit. 

Most Bible translators render the final part of 

Genesis 1:2

 somewhat like the King 

James Version: '. . . 

And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

' But 

the Watchtower organization does not believe in the personality of the Holy 

Spirit, so they have altered this text in their Bible to read '. . . God's active force 
was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters.'

8

The Watchtower society denies the Trinity, so it teaches its followers that the 

Holy Spirit is simply Jehovah God's invisible 'active force' (as rendered above in 
Genesis 1:2 of their own Bible). Their New World Translation usually renders this 

supposedly impersonal 'active force' as 'holy spirit', with no capital letters and no 

'the' in front of the words. 

Could the Watchtower translation of Genesis 1:2 be correct? Is the Holy Spirit 

really an 'active force' rather than a real personal part of the triune Godhead as 

Christians believe? Not at all. The Bible refers to the Holy Spirit in a personal 
way. He speaks (

Acts 13:2

, see the outcome in 

13:4

), bears witness (

John 15:26

), 

feels hurt (

Isaiah 63:10

), knows (

1 Corinthians 2:10,11

), wills (

1 Corinthians 

12:11

), can be insulted (

Hebrews 10:29

), and so on. Jesus spoke of the Holy Spirit 

as '

He

', not 'it'. In 

John 16:13

 for example, Jesus says: '

when he, the Spirit of 

truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself, 
but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will show you things to 

background image

come.

' Ask the Witness why Jesus Himself would have called the Holy Spirit 'He' 

if the Holy Spirit is only an 'it' as the Watchtower society teaches. And how can 

the Spirit speak, hear, bear witness, feel hurt, guide and show if He is only an 'it'? 

A passage that Jehovah's Witnesses rarely encounter in their organized Bible 

studies is 

Romans 8:26,27

. These verses simply do not fit their conception of the 

Holy Spirit. In these verses we are told the Spirit 'makes intercession' for us. Can 

a 'force' do this? We are told the Spirit has a mind. Does a 'force' have a mind? 

We are told the Spirit pleads for us. Can a 'force' plead for us? Of course not. The 

Holy Spirit is given personal attributes by Jesus and the other Bible writers 
because He is a person of the Godhead—a personal expression and form of the 

one true God. 

The Watchtower's booklet Reasoning from the Scriptures, which is chiefly 
designed to help the Witness refute the arguments of Christians, tells the Witness 

to answer the above argument by saying that it is not unusual for something to be 

personified in Scripture (wisdom, for example).

9

 But ask the Witness this: 'If the 

Holy Spirit really were a person, how would the Bible writers express this?' 
Remind them that Jesus called the Holy Spirit 'He', not 'it' (

John 16:13

). 

Sometimes the Jehovah's Witness may point to 

Acts 2:4

, which says the disciples 

were all 'filled' with the Holy Spirit. They ask, 'How could the spirit be a person, 
when it filled about 120 disciples at the same time?

'10

 But Jesus Himself, 

obviously a person, fills all things (

Ephesians 1:23

). Does this then disprove 

Jesus' personality? 

Invite the Witness to read 

Acts 5:3,4

. In these verses Ananias is accused of lying 

to the Holy Spirit. How and why would someone bother to lie to a 'force'? In the 

very next verse the Holy Spirit is identified as God ('

You have not lied to men, but 

to God

.' 

Acts 5:4

). Then invite the Witness to read 

2 Corinthians 3:17

 in his or her 

own New World Translation to show that God is the Spirit—not just the one who 

sends forth an 'active force'. In this verse the New World Translation says, 

'Jehovah is the Spirit'. 

There can be no doubt: The Watchtower translation of Genesis 1:2 is inaccurate. 

Unfortunately they have not taken other important parts of Scripture into 

account when formulating their doctrine. Instead of forming their doctrine from 
Scripture, they have made their translation of Genesis 1:2 fit their doctrine. 

...And the Word was God  

John 1:1

, a great passage cherished by Christians down through the centuries, 

clearly shows in most translations that Jesus the Creator ('

the Word

') '

was God

'. 

But here again the New World Translation has added to Scripture. The 

Watchtower's translation doesn't say 'the Word was God' —it says 'the Word was 

a god'. So Jesus is downgraded to just 'a god'. 

background image

But look where this theology leads. If Jesus is not the true God, the Watchtower 

translators must be making Him out to be a false god— no better than Baal or 

Satan. Peter warns against this: 

'. . . there shall be false teachers among you, who 

privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, 

and bring upon themselves swift destruction'

 (

2 Peter 2:1

). 

The fact is that Jesus is called God in the Bible, along with the Father and the 

Holy Spirit. Invite the Witness to look at 

John 20:28

. In this verse the Apostle 

Thomas realizes who Jesus is and exclaims: '

My Lord and my God

' (capital 'G' 

even in the New World Translation). Jesus' reply leaves no doubt that Thomas 
was expressing the truth. Thomas was a believer in the true God, and he called 

Jesus 'my God'. Thomas was referring to a specific true God, his God, namely 

Jesus. As Thomas could honestly call Jesus '

God

', it was equivalent to calling Him 

Jehovah. 

In the past some Witnesses answered this passage by saying Thomas was simply 

making an expression of surprise, equivalent to 'Oh, my God!' But few will admit 

these days that Thomas would have blasphemed in such a way, particularly 
considering Jesus' reply. 

Another passage which calls Jesus God is 

Isaiah 9:6

. This verse is heard in 

churches world-wide every Christmas. It is a prophecy from Isaiah which says: 

'For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the 

government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be 
called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting 

Father, The Prince of Peace.'

Discussion of this passage with a Jehovah's Witness usually goes like this: 

'Who is this child born unto us?'  

'It is Jesus Christ.' 

'What does the verse call Him?' 

'It calls Him Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God . . .' 

'The mighty who?' 

'Well, it calls Him the Mighty God, but He's not the Almighty God, 

who is Jehovah, the Father.' 

'What does it call Him after the mighty God?' 

(Silence.)  

background image

Again we should point out to the Jehovah's Witness where such theology leads. 

Jehovah's Witnesses must believe from such passages that Jesus is either (a) a 

false God, or (b) a second true God. Either position will be confusing for a 
Jehovah's Witness who has never thought out the argument himself. 

While on Isaiah 9:6, ask the Witness the difference between the '

Mighty God

(whom he acknowledges to be Jesus) and the '

Almighty God

' (who he says is 

Jehovah—God the Father). Perhaps he will say that the Almighty God Jehovah 

upholds all things by the word of His power. But 

Hebrews 1:3

 says this of Jesus. 

Perhaps he will say that the Almighty God Jehovah has all power in Heaven and 
earth. But 

Matthew 28:18

 says this of Jesus. By definition, 'almighty' means 'all-

powerful'.

11

 Therefore Jesus Christ is almighty. 

Also show the Jehovah's Witness that even though the Watchtower organization 
teaches that the Mighty God and the Almighty God are different, Scripture does 

not support this. Ask him to read 

Isaiah 10:20,21

 in his New World Translation

Verse 21 says, '

A mere remnant will return, the remnant of Jacob, to the Mighty 

God

.' A former Jehovah's Witness elder, David Reed, suggests you say to the 

Witness: 'Since Isaiah was a Jew and therefore believed in only one God—

Jehovah—whom did Isaiah understand the Mighty God to be?' Certainly Isaiah 

would have understood the Mighty God to be Jehovah. So the inspired Word 

written through Isaiah the prophet calls Jehovah the '

Mighty God

', even though 

the Jehovah's Witness admits that Isaiah 9:6 says Jesus is the '

Mighty God

'.

12

To reinforce the point, ask the Witness to read 

Jeremiah 32:18

 in his own Bible. 

Remind him that the Watchtower society teaches that the Mighty God and the 
Almighty God are different. Jeremiah 32:18 gives the name of the Mighty God: 

'

the true God, the great One, the mighty One, Jehovah of armies being his name

.' 

Then say to the Witness that as Jesus is the '

Mighty God

', and Jehovah is the 

'

Mighty God

', who must Jesus be? (Let him reach the conclusion himself that 

Jesus and Jehovah are one—as 

John 10:30

 says.)  

Final comments, summary, and conclusion 

It can be seen that the Watchtower's creation differs from Biblical creation in 

many important respects. Some of these are: 

1.  Their claim that a day is thousands of years long. 
2.  Their unwarranted insertion of countless years somewhere between verses 

1 and 3 of the first chapter of Genesis. 

3.  Their alteration of Genesis 1:2 to substitute 'God's active force' 

(impersonal) for 'the Spirit of God' (personal). 

4.  Their calling the Holy Spirit 'it' when Jesus Himself called the Holy Spirit 

'He'.  

5.  Their downgrading of Jesus to a creation of God instead of THE Creator 

(

Colossians 1:16,17

). (In fact they believe Jesus is simply a created angel.) 

6.  Their implication in John 1:1 that Jesus is a false god. 

background image

7.  Their distinction between 'a god' called Jesus (whom they may reluctantly 

acknowledge as 'mighty God'), and 'the God' called Jehovah (who they say 

is 'almighty God'). This is contrary to Scripture, which calls both Jesus and 
Jehovah 'mighty God'. 

All these facts should be pointed out and discussed as long as necessary with the 
Jehovah's Witness. Even though Jehovah's Witnesses are trained to sidetrack 

you, or throw in red herrings which are aimed to divert your attention to 

Armageddon or some other subject, resist the temptation until you have 

discussed all the creation aspects covered in this article. 

Your aim is to show the Witnesses that their organization has let them down 

badly in their teaching of creation. This should help them realize that the 

Watchtower's other teachings are possibly wrong too (which many are). If this is 
seen by the Jehovah's witness he or she may then be ready to accept the true 

Gospel—salvation by grace through faith instead of salvation through the 

Watchtower society's erroneous teachings (

Ephesians 2:8,9

). 

References 

1.  Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation?, Watchtower Bible and 

Tract Society of New York, Inc., Brooklyn, 1967; also, Life—How Did it Get 
Here?
 By Evolution or Creation?, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of 

New York, Inc., Brooklyn, 1985. 

2.  Life—How Did it Get Here? p. 26. 

3.  Henry M. Morris and Martin Clark, The Bible Has the Answer (Revised 

and enlarged), Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego, 1976, p. 94. 

4.  Robert H. Countess, The Jehovah's Witnesses New Testament

Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., Phillipsburg (New Jersey), 

second edition, 1987, p. 12. 

5.  Reasoning from the Scriptures, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of 

New York, Inc., Brooklyn, 1985, p. 88. 

6.  Ibid. 

7.  Reply to a Letter to the Editor, Creation  10(4), September-November 

1988, pp. 46-47. 

8.  New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, Watchtower Bible and 

Tract Society of New York, Inc., Brooklyn, 1961 (Revised 1970), Genesis 

1:2. 

9.  Ref. 5, p. 380. 

10. You Can Live Forever on a Paradise on Earth, Watchtower Bible and 

Tract Society of New York, Inc., Brooklyn, 1982, pp. 40-41. 

11. Oxford Reference Dictionary Guild Publishing, London, 1986. 

12. David A. Reed, Jehovah's Witnesses Answered Verse by Verse, Baker 

Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1986, p. 42. 

 


Document Outline